Annual financial report 2024

Statement by the person responsible

 

Mr Didier Moaté, Chief Executive Officer of Banque Palatine SA

 

Having taken every reasonable measure for this purpose, I declare that to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in this annual financial report is accurate and does not omit any material fact.

 

I declare that to the best of my knowledge, the financial statements were prepared in accordance with the applicable accounting standards and that they provide a faithful presentation of the assets, financial position and income of the company and all the companies included in the consolidation, and that the management report appearing on page 4 presents an accurate picture of the business, income and financial position of the company and all the companies included in the consolidation, as well as a description of the main risks and uncertainties to which they are exposed.

 

Chief Executive Officer

Done in Paris on 24 April 2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Board of Directors’ report

 

 

 

 

1 Board of Directors’ management report

Economic environment

In 2024, the global economy once again demonstrated its resilience, managing to absorb the successive shocks that have occurred since the post-Covid period. However, the emergence of new risks such as the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and the emergence of a populist wave around the world, has raised the spectre of geo-economic fragmentation.

Although a global recession was avoided, the global recovery remains fragile, as can be seen in the January 2025 update of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) economic outlook. The institution forecasts global growth of 3.2% in 2024, slightly down compared to growth in 2023 and lower than the average growth prevailing over the decade preceding the pandemic.

Global economic growth seems to be stabilising, however, with significant disparities between the various regions of the world. The growth rate of emerging economies is more favourable. Despite a struggling Chinese economy, which is expected to narrowly miss the growth target set by the government, annual growth in emerging economies is expected to stand at 4.2%. It is a more contrasting situation for advanced economies with annual growth expected to peak at 1.8%.

The United States is again a leading figure among the advanced economies. Recession, which was anticipated by the markets, has still not occurred and it even seems that the US Federal Reserve has won its bet of a soft landing for the US economy.

Economists have again been pleasantly surprised this year by the economy's greater-than-expected resilience, particularly with regard to household consumption expenditure and exports. The IMF therefore revised its growth forecasts upwards for 2024 to 2.8% compared to the 2.1% forecast at the beginning of the year. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth increased by 3.1% year-on-year in the third quarter according to the third estimate of the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

Indicators on the employment front, such as the unemployment rate or the creation of non-agricultural jobs, show a still buoyant labour market, even if a slowdown in this trend has been observed, a sign that the tension is less significant than it may have been in the past. The US unemployment rate stood at 4.1% in December.

Other indicators which have shown the strength of the US economy this year, are the leading Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) or ISM indexes, which measure business growth. The PMI Composite index of overall activity reached 55.4 points at the end of the year, thanks in particular to extremely positive activity in the services sector. The index in this sector reached its highest level for 33 months in December at 56.8 points.

The economic situation in the Eurozone is much less buoyant.

The two drivers, France and Germany, are operating at reduced capacity at present. Germany is suffering from the crisis of its economic model in addition to a political crisis. According to the publication of the German National Institute of Statistics (Destatis), the country is in recession for the second consecutive year with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2024 down by 0.2%.

As for France, it was plunged into political uncertainty in June with the decision to dissolve the National Assembly. Early legislative elections followed, which did not result in a clear majority. The second half of the year was therefore unstable politically, culminating in the passing of a motion of censure in early December on the vote of the 2025 Social Security budget, thus bringing down the government that had been in office for barely three months.

Economic operators, households and businesses are adopting a wait-and-see attitude in this climate of uncertainty, which is likely to weigh on future growth.

GDP is expected to stand at +1.1% in 2024, as indicated by INSEE's (French National Institute of Economic and Statistical Information) first estimate on the French national accounts for 2024, thanks in particular to a third quarter that benefited from the impact of the Olympic Games.

The excellent performance of the Spanish economy stands out, which benefited from the dynamic momentum of its tourism sector as well as strong domestic demand. The country is also seeing a significant improvement in its public finances. According to the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, growth is expected to be +3.2% over the year.

Growth for the Eurozone as a whole is expected to be less than 1%, based on the IMF’s January 2025 economic forecast update, which expects growth of 0.8%.

An abundance of activity indicators point to a sluggish level of activity in the Eurozone. The PMI Composite index hovered around the 50-point level throughout the year without taking a clear step in either direction. This is the level that separates a zone in which activity is expanding from one in which it is contracting. It stood at 49.6 points at the end of the year. The weakness of manufacturing activity is still notable, with an index which has been in contraction territory for more than two years.

The European Commission's indicator, which measures economic confidence via a survey of economic agents, is changing below its long-term average, with a downturn in the second half of the year.

However, the job market in the Eurozone remained favourable this year with a positive trend in job creation. The unemployment rate was down over the year to 6.3% in December, compared to 6.5% a year earlier.

In a context of falling interest rates for the main central banks, the performance of global stock market indices was clearly positive this year, with the exception of the French index, which was constrained by the domestic political context.

US equity markets again led the year's stock market performance.

Stock market indices across the Atlantic posted double-digit growth, such as the Nasdaq Composite, which recorded the strongest growth at more than 28%. The S&P 500 gained slightly more than 23% over the year to 5,882 points. For the world’s oldest stock market index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the performance was nearly 13%.

In Germany, the DAX recorded a remarkable increase of just under 19% in 2024, reaching a level close to the symbolic threshold of 20,000 points. The Eurostoxx 50 increased by 8.3% and closed 2024 at 4,896 points.

In France, the flagship index of the Paris market, the CAC40, suffered from the troubled political context and resulting uncertainties, posting a decidedly lacklustre performance compared to its peers. It closed the year at 7,381 points, a decline of more than 2% over the year.

On the commodities market, the price of a barrel of Brent, like its US counterpart WTI, remained relatively stable during 2024 despite a turbulent geopolitical context. Faced with declining demand, the member countries of the intergovernmental organisation (OPEC) maintained their production reduction target. A barrel of Brent fell 3.1% while WTI ended up +0.1% at just under US$72 per barrel.

For crypto-assets, 2024 will be marked as the year Bitcoin crossed the symbolic threshold of US$100,000. The price of the Queen of cryptos soared at the end of 2024, buoyed by the election of Donald Trump and the promise of deregulation.

The persistence of geopolitical (conflicts in the Near and Middle East, in Ukraine) or political tensions (American election, dissolution of the French National Assembly) coupled with growing demand from central banks, particularly the main emerging countries, which want to “de-dollarise”, resulted in a rise in the price of gold to more than US$2,600 per ounce at the end of the year.

Interest rate trends

After several years of fighting galloping inflation, which had reached a high of nearly 10% in the United States and was even higher in the Eurozone, 2024 was the year when turning points were reached for the major central banks.

A year of transition during which central bankers began to ease key rates, made possible by the disinflation phase that continued this year in most regions.

Inflation in the Eurozone stood at 2.4% in December, 0.5 percentage points lower than its December 2023 level. It should be noted that an unfavourable base effect, particularly on energy, resulted in an upward trend in overall inflation in the last quarter. However, after restating for volatile items, it is clear that inflation has indeed been reduced. Concerning the continuation of the disinflation trend, it should be noted that inflation in the price of services has been stable at 4% for the past year.

In this context, the European Central Bank (ECB) initiated the normalisation of its monetary policy at its meeting in June with a first cut in key rates of 25 basis points. The movement continued at its meetings in September, October and December. The deposit rate was thus reduced by 100 basis points over the full year to stand at 3% at the end of the year. In March, the Governing Council also issued a report on the review of the operational framework for the implementation of monetary policy. As such, the difference between the deposit rate and the main refinancing rate was reduced by 35 basis points in order to promote the transmission of the Council's decisions in the money market.

At 31 December, the main refinancing rate was therefore 3.15% and the marginal lending facility rate was 3.40%.

As regards the ECB's balance sheet, it continues to be reduced at a measured and predictable pace, as the Governing Council has ended the reinvestment of the principal from maturing securities under the APP (Asset Purchase Programme), as well as those from the PEPP (Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme) portfolio since December.

The President of the ECB, Christine Lagarde, expressed confidence at the final meeting of the year in achieving the medium-term target of 2% for the future trajectory of European inflation. Disinflation is “on track” according to Ms Lagarde. At this stage, the underlying inflation measures point to a return to 2% in the near future.

In the United States, the US Federal Reserve (FED) waited a little longer than the ECB before initiating a rate cut but the cut was larger than its European counterpart's, with an initial reduction of 50 basis points in September.

However, the total for the year was similar, with a downward trend totalling 100 basis points. At the end of the year, the Fed Funds were in the [4.25%; 4.50%] bracket.

On the other hand, the US Governing Council has been more cautious about the trajectory of future reductions.

The US election which captured the world's attention in November and resulted in Donald Trump's victory leaves many questions unanswered. The newly elected President's programme contains measures that are inflationary. It remains to be seen to what extent they will be implemented.

As such, the members of the Federal Reserve are anticipating only two rate cuts of 25 basis points each in 2025, compared to four previously.

In this context of lower key rates, the movement was reflected in the money markets and in particular short-term rates.

In Europe, the benchmark rate for overnight transactions, the €ster, fell by 98 basis points to 2.91% at the end of the year compared with 3.88% a year earlier. The three-month Euribor was down by 119 basis points and ended the year at 2.71%, close to its lowest point of the year.

The inversion of the euro long yield curve that prevailed at the end of 2023 is no longer relevant. In September, the yield curve reversed. The curve has therefore steepened over the year, particularly due to the more significant drop in short-term maturity rates.

The 2-year Swap rate fell by 58 basis points, standing at 2.13% on 31 December, while the 10-year Swap rate fell by 11 basis points to 2.35%.

In the United States, the revision of interest rate cut forecasts by FED members at the end of the year contributed to the flattening of the US yield curve. The 2-year Swap rate closed the year at 4.08% and the 10-year rate at 4.07%.

Regarding sovereign debt, the political situation in France weighed on French government OAT (medium and long-term treasury securities) yields. The rate spread between the yield on French and German debt, which is the measure generally scrutinised by investors to monitor the specific French risk, thus surged to stand at 83 bps at the end of the year. It was 33 bps lower prior to the announcement of the dissolution of the French National Assembly, at 50 bps. The 10-year yield on French debt thus stood at 3.19% compared to 2.36% for the yield on German debt of the same maturity. Conversely, the perception of risk for Portugal, Spain and Italy has improved. The US 10-year ended the year at 4.57%.

2Banque Palatine Sustainability report

Part 3 - Social information

3.1 / S1 - Own workforce

3.1

3.1.1 / SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

3.1.1

3.1.2 / SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model

3.1.2

3.1.3 / Impacts, risk and opportunity management

3.1.3

3.1.4 / Targets

3.1.4

3.1.5 / Metrics - Scope of coverage

3.1.5

3.2 / S2 - Workers in the value chain

3.2

3.2.1 / SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

3.2.1

3.2.2 / SBM 3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and interaction with strategy and business model

3.2.2

3.2.3 / Impact, risk and opportunity management

3.2.3

3.2.4 / Metrics and targets

3.2.4

3.3 / S3 - Affected communities

3.3

3.3.1 / SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

3.3.1

3.3.2 / SBM 3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and interaction with the strategy and business model

3.3.2

3.3.3 / Impact, risk and opportunity management

3.3.3

3.3.4 / Metrics and targets

3.3.4

3.4 / S4 - Consumers and end-users

3.4

3.4.1 / SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

3.4.1

3.4.2 / SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and interaction with the strategy and business model

3.4.2

3.4.3 / Impacts, risks and opportunities management

3.4.3

3.4.4 / Metrics and targets

3.4.4

Part 4 - Governance information

4.1 / G1 - Business conduct

4.1

4.1.1 / Impact, risk and opportunity management

4.1.1

4.1.2 / Metrics and targets

4.1.2

Part 5 - European taxonomy metrics on sustainable activities

Part 6 – Statutory Auditor's report on on Banque Palatine's Sustainability report

Part 1 - General information

1.1Basis for preparation
1.1.1BP 1 - General basis for the preparation of sustainability statements

Banque Palatine has prepared its sustainability report in accordance with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). These standards provide a comprehensive framework for the disclosure of non-financial information on environmental, social and governance issues.

The bank's sustainability report is based on a double materiality approach, which takes into account both Banque Palatine's impact on the environment and society, and the impact of environmental and social issues on the company's performance. This approach ensures that the sustainability report is relevant to all stakeholders, including employees, investors, customers and the communities in which the bank operates. It also includes a presentation of the risks and opportunities related to sustainable development facing the bank.

Scope of the sustainability report

Banque Palatine prepared this report by collecting data on a consolidated basis, from all its activities and its value chain, both upstream and downstream. This sustainability report is audited, as required by the regulations, with a limited level of assurance, as detailed in the audit paragraph below. The scope of consolidation used for the sustainability report is the same as for the financial statements.

The following subsidiaries are included in Banque Palatine's consolidation and are exempt from the obligation to provide individual and consolidated sustainability information: Palatine Asset Management and Ariès.

Any exclusions from the reporting scope by family of indicators are mentioned in the description of each indicator or in footnotes where applicable.

1.1.2BP 2 - Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
1.1.2.1Time horizons

In most cases, the significant impacts, risks and opportunities have been assessed in the short, medium and long term. The short term refers to the presentation period of the annual financial statements. To provide forward-looking information on the bank's significant impacts, risks, and opportunities in its sustainability statements, Banque Palatine, in accordance with Groupe BPCE, has adopted the general principles set out in section 6.4 of ESRS 1, namely:

  • 1 year as short term,
  • Between 1 year and 5 years as medium term,
  • More than 5 years as long term.

When the time horizons deviate from these general guidelines, this information is communicated at the same time as the relevant information concerning the specific material subject. During the preparation of this sustainability report, forward-looking estimates and assumptions were made. The results observed may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

1.1.2.2Value chain estimates

The indicators must cover the entire consolidated scope. However, for the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions under ESRS E1-6 (greenhouse gas emissions), the indicator is calculated over an extended scope. Scope 3, category 15 emissions relate to the value chain, in particular financed emissions.

In order to calculate Scope 3 category 15 emissions on the banking portfolio, greenhouse gas data come from several sources:

  • purchase of supplier data (Carbone4, Trucost, CDP);
  • data collected from Banque Palatine customers (EPD - Energy Performance Diagnostic); and
  • public databases (Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment and ADEME).

When data is not available, Groupe BPCE, which performed the calculation for all the entities within its scope concerned by the sustainability report, including Banque Palatine, uses sector-specific intensity estimates: extrapolation or PCAF proxy.

1.1.2.3Sources of uncertainty concerning estimates and outcome

This report, known as the "Banque Palatine sustainability report", was prepared in accordance with the legal and regulatory requirements resulting from the transposition of the European Directive on the disclosure of information on companies' sustainability (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive or “CSRD Directive”). This first year of application is characterised by uncertainties about the interpretation of the texts, which are generalist and cover all sectors of activity but do not specify a specific framework for banking and financial business models. There is also the absence of established practices or comparative information and certain data, in particular within the “value chain”.

With regard to what follows, Banque Palatine has drawn on all the work done by Groupe BPCE in preparing its own sustainability report.

Groupe BPCE has endeavoured to apply the normative requirements set by the ESRS, as applicable at the date of the sustainability statement, based on the information available within the timeframe for its preparation, by doing its best to reflect its role as a universal bank-insurer, as well as its various business models.

For the double materiality analysis and, in particular, that relating to its value chain, Groupe BPCE encountered limitations relating to the maturity of its valuation methodologies and the availability of data. As presented in section 1.4.1.1 on the Environment (E), we considered that only the issue of mitigation and adaptation related to climate change is material within the meaning of the standard. The limitations on the information and methodologies available at this stage did not enable the materiality of Nature-related ESRS to be determined in accordance with the standard, which resulted in the Group assessing these environmental issues as non-material. ​This assessment was based on the definitions of the standard, and the methodologies available to assess and carry out the rating exercises. This assessment is mainly explained by the lack of consensus on robust methodologies developed for the issues in question, and the lack of relevant and appropriate data that would enable a link to be established between the impact or risks for Groupe BPCE on these issues throughout its value chain. ​In view of Groupe BPCE’s continuous improvement approach to these environmental issues, the work and ongoing changes in international methodologies, the standards that are being put in place, the best market practices that are emerging and information and data from its customers, which should gradually become available, this double materiality analysis may change in the coming years. The dual materiality analysis, the results of which are presented in this report, aims to qualify the impacts, risks and opportunities as described in the CSRD standard: this analysis only meets the needs of sustainability reporting and not the analysis of factors risks presented in the chapter on risk management.

For the data points presented in this report, Groupe BPCE used methodological options that it deemed relevant and estimates for numerous data, particularly concerning the various activities in its value chain. The data, analyses, and studies carried out do not guarantee that expectations and targets will be achieved: they are based on objectives, commitments, estimates, assumptions, standards, and methodologies under development and currently available data, which continue to evolve and develop. Some of the information in this document was obtained from public sources, sources that seem reliable, or market references: Groupe BPCE has not verified it independently. In addition, Groupe BPCE notes that the information expected in terms of sustainability is based on so-called “agnostic” European standards (ESRS), which are generalist and do not reflect the specificities of the financial sector. As a result, certain data items deemed irrelevant or inapplicable, in the light of Groupe BPCE’s business models and value chain, have not been produced. The same applies to certain data points relating to the taxonomy regulation.

The Banque Palatine has not defined a transition plan for the first CSRD financial year specifically for climate change mitigation and adaptation. However, as a member of Groupe BPCE, it contributes to the implementation and performance of the transition plan through its business model and specific characteristics. This is described in Groupe BPCE’s sustainability report. It differentiates between actions relating to its own operations, targets and actions that it has set itself in order to contribute to decarbonising the economy by supporting its customers. The actions described present, in particular, the achievements and roadmap for the actions that appear to impact the downstream value chain. The Group’s transition plan describes past, current and future efforts to align its financing, investment and insurance portfolios with scientifically established trajectories aimed at achieving global carbon neutrality by supporting its customers with their environmental transition. Groupe BPCE's report does not quantify the effects of decarbonisation levers or future estimates of total financed emissions. The actions undertaken by the Group cannot replace those of the individuals, companies or governments it supports in the transition, and the transition to a low-carbon economy depends on many factors outside the control of Groupe BPCE.

Regarding the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, as a service company, Groupe BPCE emits a limited level of CO2eq in terms of its own operations, including by integrating the upstream value chain (purchases, including those related to IT and technological investments, mobility including business trips, etc.) and its customers travelling to its branches or business centres. Most of Groupe BPCE’s GHG emissions come from financed emissions and are subject to a normative calculation for category 15 for downstream “investment” value chain emissions, otherwise known as “financed emissions”, aimed at attributing to the financial institution a portion of the CO2 emissions of its financed customers or securities in which it invests. This calculation takes into account scopes 1,2 and 3 of the customers, which also includes the emissions of their value chain and leads to a maximalist calculation. It is estimated that financed emissions can, on average, account for three times the same greenhouse gas emissions for portfolios exposed to companies in the same value chain. For this sustainability statement, the Group considered the mandatory categories of financial assets provided for in the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) protocol for calculating financed emissions. The scopes, methodologies used and the main assumptions and data sources are detailed in the paragraph relating to (E1-6) “Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions”.

With regard to Taxonomy, the assumptions used and limitations are detailed in chapter 2.1 Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities.

Groupe BPCE believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, however they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, they are difficult to predict, generally outside of the control of Groupe BPCE, sometimes unknown and liable to lead to results or transform events that are significantly different from those expressed, implied or anticipated by said forward-looking information and statements.

1.1.2.4Changes in the preparation or presentation of sustainability information

The sustainability report for the 2024 financial year is the first such report produced by Banque Palatine. No change in the definition or calculation of metrics, including those used to set targets and monitor progress towards their achievement, is to be reported.

1.1.2.5Reporting of errors in prior periods

As indicated above, as this financial year is the first, comparative data with previous periods are not presented. The reporting of errors in previous periods does not extend to the reference periods preceding this first year of application of the sustainability standards by the company. Furthermore, no significant error related to the previous Green Asset Ratio (GAR) period was identified.

1.1.2.6Publication of information from other legislation or widely accepted sustainability information frameworks

Banque Palatine has defined sustainability risk as a risk factor in its risk management framework. The chapter on environmental, social and governance risks under Pillar III ESG describes how the bank defines and manages these risks. This chapter also contains an overview of the impact of climate and environmental risks on other types of risks. Further details on the methodologies and management used for traditional types of risks, such as credit risk, market risk, operational risk and liquidity risk, are provided in chapter 4 Risk Factors and Management.

In addition, the elements relating to the eligibility and alignment of the Group’s portfolio as defined in regulation (EU) 2020/852 and supplemented by delegated regulations (EU) 2021/2178, 2021/2139 and 2023/2486 are included in chapter 2.1. Indicators of the European taxonomy on sustainable activities

1.1.2.7Incorporation of information by reference

In order to avoid repetition, ESRS 1 allows sections prepared in other documents, such as the management report, to be incorporated by means of a simple reference, provided that the information is equivalent, particularly in terms of reliability. This generally concerns the sections relating to the description of the company’s activities and strategy, its governance, remuneration policies, risk factors and the duty of care. The ESRS consider that it is essential to ensure and explain consistency between the sustainability report and the financial statements, paying particular attention to significant amounts, assumptions and projections. The amounts considered material from the financial statements must be accompanied by a reference, although the presentation of a comparison table between the amounts in the sustainability report and those in the financial statements remains optional.

The following information is incorporated by reference at the Banque Palatine level:

 

Name of the disclosure
requirement

Data point

Registration Document

Section of the Registration
Document

Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances

ESRS BP-2 Para. 15

Annual report

Chapter 4 Risk Management Report

The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

ESRS 2 GOV-1 Para. 19 & 21

Annual report

See chapter 1.3 "Report on corporate governance"

Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting

ESRS 2 GOV-5 Para. 36 (a)

Annual report

Chapter 4 Risk Management Report

1.2Strategy
1.2.1SBM 1 - Strategy, business model and value chain
1.2.1.1Sustainability-related strategy

Banque Palatine is part of Groupe BPCE, the second largest banking group in France. A little less than 1,100 employees serving 46,000 corporate customers and 13,500 private customers work closely with natural persons or legal entities, responding in a concrete way to the needs of the real economy.

In 2024, faced with environmental, demographic, technological and geopolitical challenges, Banque Palatine is fully committed to financing French medium-sized companies and supporting all its customers in adapting to their new environment.

At the same time, Banque Palatine was attentive to the working conditions of its employees during a year marked by the development of its new model and moving upmarket. Efforts focused on career support, mobility, skills development and recruitment.

On the environmental aspect, in addition to the continuation of awareness-raising workshops on climate issues for the bank’s employees, a Sustainable Finance Programme was created to improve the support and transition services offered to customers.

Faithful to its commitment to community involvement and its values, Banque Palatine continued its societal actions, made donations and supported charitable projects (see section 1.2.3 Sponsorship policy – partnerships).

Characterised by gender-balanced governance, promoting gender equality is therefore a key focus of its strategy.

Banque Palatine therefore intends to continue all its projects aimed at promoting greater integration of environmental and social issues into its activities and relations with its stakeholders between now and 2030. This will notably involve continuing to provide special support to its medium-sized corporate customer and senior executives committed to sustainable, low-carbon and carbon-neutral growth, and including three separate projects with clearly defined objectives in its new Palatine 2030 strategic plan.

1.2.1.1.1Sustainability-related strategy

Palatine 2030 traces the major strategic priorities set in order to build its new strategic plan for the benefit of its customers. Banque Palatine’s VISION 2030 is reflected in seven markers that embody an ambitious development plan combining innovation, excellence and performance, as described in section 1.2.1.2.2.

Environmental impact

The latest IPCC assessment report published in 2023 highlights the continued increase in greenhouse gas emissions worldwide and the growing impacts of climate change and damage to ecosystems and populations.

Faced with the climate emergency, Groupe BPCE and Banque Palatine's approach aims to rapidly implement and deploy measures to mitigate and adapt to the already tangible environmental and socio-economic impacts of climate change and the erosion of biodiversity. Making impact accessible to all means raising awareness and massively supporting all its customers in the environmental transition through expertise, consulting offers and global solutions.

By drawing on the scenarios defined by science, Groupe BPCE and the Banque Palatine are positioning themselves as facilitators of transition efforts, with a clear and ambitious objective: to finance a carbon-neutral economy in 2050 by taking action today.

In this context, Banque Palatine offers:

  • Impact solutions
    • for Private Banking customers: support energy renovation by offering financing solutions and by mobilising its role as an operator, trusted third party as well as its partnerships:
      • by offering a "Sustainable Advice and Solutions" tool in partnership with ADEME, enabling people to easily calculate their carbon footprint and receive advice and assistance for energy renovation work, carbon-free mobility or green savings,
      • by supporting energy renovation projects for condominiums at each stage: energy assessment, search for subsidies, completion of work guarantee, with pathways and financing adapted to each situation,
      • by increasing the number of financing for the energy renovation of buildings,
      • By offering sustainable solutions for investor customers with a range of responsible savings and investments: sustainable development passbook savings accounts, funds with a sustainable investment objective, themed-labelled funds, etc.;
    • for corporate customers: supporting the transition of its medium-sized corporate customers’ business models. Banque Palatine is committed to engaging in dedicated dialogue and providing sector-specific expertise to integrate ESG issues according to their size and economic sector, particularly in energy and transport infrastructure etc.;
  • a support for the evolution of the energy mix: faced with the climate emergency, the priority is to accelerate the transition to a sustainable energy system:
    • by playing a leading role in the financing of debt projects for the renewable energy sector,
    • by increasing its financing dedicated to the production and storage of green electricity,
    • by providing financial support and advice through specialist partners to assist the energy transition of medium-sized companies, particularly in the industrial sector,
    • by supporting the reindustrialisation of regions and energy sovereignty,
    • by leveraging dedicated teams of experts in both project financing and business transition support;
  • alignment of its financing, investment and insurance portfolios with trajectories compatible with the objectives of the Paris Agreement:
    • by developing systems to measure carbon emissions,
    • by developing its system for identifying and managing climate, physical and transition risks to which its customers and its own activities are exposed, in a spirit of continuous improvement,
    • by gradually withdrawing from activities with the highest emissions, in particular through adapted ESG policies.
    • In this context, the Group has joined the Net Zero Banking Alliance initiative of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP FI), and has a decarbonisation goal for the most carbon-emitting sectors. Banque Palatine is involved in this work;
Societal impact

Banque Palatine is a key player in regional dynamics by financing companies in their regions.

Banque Palatine is committed to supporting local and national initiatives and assists organisations in the fields of art and culture, gender equality, sport.

1.2.1.1.2Sustainability-related targets

Among the strategic priorities of its new VISION 2030 strategy, Groupe BPCE is renewing its commitment to environmental and societal transitions. It is committed to making the impact accessible to all and to strengthening its global positive impact through the strength of its local solutions.

 

Banque Palatine is part of this strategy and has defined quantitative targets for 2025, broken down below:

 

Sustainable Finance indicators

Completed in 2024

2025 target

HQLA ESG (1)

17.1%

22%

Production of renewable energy

25% of total corporate
financing production in 2024

25% of total corporate
 financing production in 2025 (2)

Green portion of Banque Palatine 
financing production

Production impact loans

 

ESG questionnaire (active companies turnover > €3 million)

57%

70%

  • (1)HQLAs are assets that can be quickly converted into cash without significant loss of value. They are used by banks to meet liquidity requirements, such as those imposed by the short-term liquidity ratio (LCR) under Basel III. ESG HQLA are compliant with Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) criteria.
  • (2)Due to the changing geopolitical context and European regulations

Own footprint indicators

Completed in 2024

2026 target

Carbon footprint reduction

+2% (compared

 to 2023)

-6% (compared
 to 2023)

 

Despite efforts to reduce energy and travel costs, the year-on-year increase (between 2023 and 2024) is mainly due to the relocation of Banque Palatine's head office in May 2024 (with an increase in the Purchase and Waste item) which affected half of the bank's workforce.

1.2.1.2Business model

 

Banque Palatine, a hybrid business model within Groupe BPCE
PAL2024_RFA_EN_I009_HD.png

 

1.2.1.2.1Description of the main groups of products and/or services offered

Banque Palatine, a 100% subsidiary of Groupe BPCE, is mainly dedicated to medium-sized companies, senior executives and private banking. For more than 240 years, Banque Palatine has been working alongside entrepreneurs on both a professional and personal level. It provides them with a range of banking products (current accounts, real estate and personal loans, financial investments, financing solutions to meet environmental challenges) and insurance products. Its network consists of 38 branches, including 26 business centres and private banking and four premium branches.

Banque Palatine offers value-added expertise dedicated to supporting its customers’ growth and performance: wealth, legal and tax engineering, investment advice, global approach to senior executives’ assets, corporate finance, specialised approach to real estate, trade finance, client desk, etc.

In the regulated real estate market, where the bank is the market leader, and in the audiovisual market, where it is a key player, it deploys a dedicated national organisation.

Its slogan “The art of being a banker” illustrates Banque Palatine’s desire to develop a local relational model based on excellent support for its customers.

Palatine Asset Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banque Palatine, is a “premium boutique” asset management company focused on developing useful finance that gives meaning and value to its customer's investments.

Its value proposition is focused on the search for sustainable investment solutions to meet different investor profiles from institutional to private customers.

Its team, comprising around 30 employees with complementary profiles, has solid expertise in fixed income management, equity management and diversified management. This expertise is reflected in its range of funds and its portfolio management offer.

As of 31 December 2024, assets under management amounted to €4.01 billion.

1.2.1.2.2Description of major markets and/or target customer groups

Banque Palatine, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BPCE SA, serves approximately 60,000 customers in France: 13,500 corporate customers and 46,000 private banking customers.

In 2024, Banque Palatine drew up its new strategic plan Palatine 2030, which is based on a purpose co-built with the bank’s employees, where Banque Palatine demonstrates its desire to actively engage in order to contribute to the energy and environmental transition by reducing its carbon footprint and supporting its customers in improving their impact.

The purpose of the bank is thus defined: “As a banking house since 1780, we have been shaping our know-how, our agility and a culture of excellence to be the trusted partner of our customers, both Corporate and Private Banking. We are convinced that French medium-sized companies and their senior executives are at the heart of the economic and socio-environmental challenges of today and tomorrow. As entrepreneurs at the service of entrepreneurs, we contribute to a more sustainable economy by investing in the success of their development, transformation and transmission projects”.

The Palatine 2030 strategic plan is built around three pillars: the customer, people and risk.

Customers are placed at the centre of Banque Palatine’s strategy as a fundamental priority. Risk expertise is confirmed as a marker of its differentiation. Finally, people are at the heart of its focus, making it the bank where the future of work is being shaped and experienced every day.

Banque Palatine’s vision for 2030 is illustrated by seven markers that reflect an ambitious development plan combining innovation, excellence and performance:

  • the bank of one in four medium-sized companies and one in two family-owned medium-sized companies,
  • the reference bank for supporting medium-sized companies in their transitions,
  • the benchmark for senior executives in terms of Private Banking,
  • the leading bank for asset managers (ADB),
  • a bank that innovates to strengthen its businesses in the areas of risk, data and new technologies,
  • a bank with the “Great place to work” label,
  • a bank that innovates to strengthen its businesses in the areas of risk, data and new technologies,
  • in the top 3 banks in the cultural and creative industry (cinema, streaming platforms, e-sports structures, content creators, live entertainment, etc.).

In addition, 20 major cross-functional projects were initiated by the end of 2024 to achieve the ambitious objectives by 2030. One of them is a “hat” project whose goal is to reach a new milestone for the CSR Committed label. Its objectives are to minimise the bank’s direct footprint, maximise its positive impact and engage even more with all its stakeholders. Another key project is the sustainable finance initiative, which aims to train sales teams in sustainable finance, define and roll out the bank's green strategy, set up a Palatine hub, foster a community of sustainable finance experts and enrich its offering.

1.2.1.2.3Description of the number of employees by geographical area

Banque Palatine has 1,027 employees, 100% of whom are based in France.

1.2.1.2.4Description of products and services prohibited in certain markets
Banking activities

Sector-specific ESG policies govern the activities of Groupe BPCE in sectors considered sensitive from an environmental, social and governance (ESG) point of view, including those of Banque Palatine.

Specific appendices cover the following sectors:

  • thermal coal (the Group is applying a strategy to gradually reduce the exposure of its banking activities to thermal coal to zero by 2030 for the European Union and OECD countries and 2040 for the rest of the world),
  • oil and gas industry.

In addition, Banque Palatine has established strict rules regarding financing for real estate professionals: if the financing concerns an older residential property with an Energy Performance Diagnostic (EPD) rating of E, F or G, it can only be granted if renovation investments are planned. The same applies to commercial assets of less than 1,000 m² that do not meet the minimum criteria defined by the bank.

Palatine Asset Management activities

As part of its Responsible Investment approach, Palatine AM was quick to implement a policy to exclude the coal sector and monitor contentious issues in order to reduce its exposure to ESG risks, as well as its policy of excluding controversial weapons. ​

By excluding these issuers, Palatine AM wishes to focus its investment choices on the most responsible companies.

These exclusion lists have since been expanded to include the tobacco, oil and gas sectors, companies that violate the principles of the United Nations Global Compact, non-transparent issuers and, finally, the most carbon-intensive electricity producers.

In parallel with this exclusion policy, Palatine AM is also committed to engaging with companies to encourage them to improve their environmental, social and governance practices. The objective is to promote long-term sustainable performance.

The full policy is available at the following address: Palatine AM exclusion policy.

1.2.1.3Labels and commitments
Groupe BPCE

Groupe BPCE has made several long-standing commitments to scale up its actions and accelerate the positive transformations to which it is contributing.

Global Compact

Since 2003, the Group has been a participating member of the Global Compact (United Nations Global Compact), which defines ten principles relating to respect for human rights, labour standards, environmental protection and the fight against corruption.

Principles for responsible banking, UNEP Finance Initiative

Groupe BPCE signed the Principles for Responsible Banking on 23 September 2019 and are committed to strategically aligning their activities with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Climate Agreement.

Net Zero Banking Alliance

In July 2021, Groupe BPCE joined the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), a financial initiative of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP FI) covering more than 40% of the assets financed by banks worldwide. This alliance between banking institutions is a decisive step in the mobilisation of the financial sector. In accordance with its commitment to align the trajectory of its portfolios with the objective of carbon neutrality by 2050, Groupe BPCE has published its ambitions for the eleven sectors with the highest carbon emissions (power generation, oil and gas, automotive, steel, cement, aluminium, aviation, commercial real estate, residential real estate and agriculture).

Act4Nature

Because protecting biodiversity is one of the greatest challenges of our time, Groupe BPCE, by joining Act4Nature International in 2024, is strengthening its commitment to the environment by renewing the partnership supported by Natixis since 2018. The Group has joined act4nature international, a coalition that mobilises businesses, public authorities, scientists and environmental associations to protect, promote and restore biodiversity, and has set itself 24 ambitious targets as part of its activities as a bank, insurer and investor.

Palatine Asset Management
Principles for responsible investment

In addition, the principles for responsible investment (PRI) were introduced by the United Nations in 2006. This voluntary commitment, aimed at asset management players, encourages investors to integrate environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues into the management of their portfolios. The PRI are a means for promoting the generalisation of the consideration of non-financial aspects by all financial businesses.

At the end of 2019, Palatine Asset Management joined the signatories of the principles for responsible investment.

Banque Palatine
CSR Committed Label

Banque Palatine was labelled CSR Committed by AFNOR in May 2024 for a period of three years and obtained the level of progression. This label enables the maturity of an organisation’s CSR initiatives to be assessed on the basis of ISO 26000 (international CSR standard). It is also a tool for strategic thinking and appropriation of CSR issues, internal mobilisation, management and structuring of the CSR approach with stakeholders.

Professional Equality Label

Banque Palatine also obtained the Professional Equality Label from AFNOR. Issued for four years, this label is a mark of recognition of the actions performed in favour of professional equality by an approved independent body.

1.2.1.4Value chain

As a financial institution, Banque Palatine receives funds in the form of customer deposits or purchases of financial instruments by investors and grants loans to its customers (banking transformation function).

The downstream value chain includes customers who benefit from Banque Palatine's products or services, particularly loans.

The upstream value chain comprises suppliers of products or services to Banque Palatine.

Own operations concern resources (e.g. employees, IT, premises, etc.).

 

PAL2024_RFA_EN_I017_HD.png

 

1.2.2SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

It is essential for Banque Palatine to take its stakeholders into account in order to improve how it identifies and assesses its sustainability impact. Groupe BPCE is committed to maintaining an ongoing dialogue with its counterparties. The stakeholder consultation process within Groupe BPCE is based on a large number of systems whose purpose is to co-construct and involve our stakeholders in our process of identifying and assessing impacts, risks and opportunities, as well as levers for improving our positive impact on both environmental and societal issues.

With regard to Banque Palatine, stakeholder expectations are also identified and taken into account through regular contact with the senior executives of the Banques Populaires and Caisses d'Epargne, as the board members of Banque Palatine are corporate officers of these institutions. But also via meetings with rating agencies, discussions with regulators, image surveys and prospective surveys. Finally, surveys of the bank's employees and regular meetings with staff representatives are also good ways to identify changes in stakeholder expectations.

The partnership with a consulting firm has been set up to support our medium-sized corporate customers in taking into account their environmental challenges. In addition, a sustainable finance programme has been set up to meet the expectations of our customers.

 

Summary of stakeholder dialogue

Stakeholders

Dialogue methods

Purpose

PAL2024_RFA_Membres_Conseil_HD.png

 

Board members

  • Participation in specialised committees
  • Training programmes and seminars
  • Participation in the definition of strategic orientations
  • Monitoring function, in particular risk management and reliability of internal control
PAL2024_RFA_Collaborateurs_HD.png

Employees

  • Social survey (internal survey measuring the social climate in the Group’s companies) and business line satisfaction survey
  • Annual interviews
  • Training
  • Internal communication
  • Non-profit networks (women, intergenerational, LGBT+)
  • Employee whistleblowing rights
  • Consultation of employee representatives and representative trade unions
  • Improving quality of life at work, health and safety at work
  • Employee loyalty and commitment (career and talent management, skills and expertise development)
  • Participation of employee representatives in major strategic and transformation issues and negotiation of agreements
  • Measurement of satisfaction
PAL2024_RFA_Clients_HD.png

Customers

  • Interviews
  • Dedicated dialogue to integrate ESG issues
  • Customer events
  • NPS satisfaction surveys
  • Institutional and commercial partnerships
  • Voting policies (available on the websites of the asset management subsidiaries)
  • Definition of offers and customer support
  • ESG dialogue: customer acculturation on ESG issues, support for transformation initiatives, risk assessment for better prevention and management by the customer and for incorporation of ESG criteria in the granting of loans
  • Improving customer satisfaction
  • Monitoring of the respect for compliance and ethics rules in commercial policies, procedures and sales
  • Complaint management
  • Mediation
PAL2024_RFA_PartenairesAffaires_HD.png

Suppliers and sub-contractors

  • Responsible purchasing policy
  • Regular meetings with strategic suppliers
  • “Supplier voices” survey
  • Preparation of certifications
  • Listening system and satisfaction surveys
  • Supplier whistleblowing rights and establishment of an independent mediator
  • Audit
  • Responsible Supplier Relations Charter, involving suppliers in the implementation of duty of care measures
  • Compliance with ESG clauses included in contracts
  • Identification of progress plans to better understand supplier expectations
  • Improving the level of satisfaction and the relationship
  • Consultations and calls for tenders
  • Measurement of satisfaction
PAL2024_RFA_Acteurs_HD.png

Institutions, federations, regulators

  • Regular meetings (public authorities, regulators, chambers of commerce and industry, etc.)
  • Contribution to the work of the financial market, participation in sectoral working groups
  • Responses to public consultations
  • Transmission of information and documents
  • Constructively contributing to public debate and participate in collective, fair and informed decision-making
  • Taking into account sector specificities
  • Regulatory compliance
PAL2024_RFA_Agences_HD.png

Rating agencies, investors and independent third parties

  • Regular dialogue, participation in meetings (technical meetings, roadshows, conferences, etc.)
  • Transfer of information and documents for ratings/audits
  • Publication of official documents: annual report, half-year report, press releases, investor website
  • Improving transparency
  • Diversification of the Group’s refinancing, in particular by promoting the issuance of Green/social/sustainable bonds
  • Improving financial and non-financial ratings
  • Meeting the expectations and questions of investors and rating agencies
  • Publication of reports
PAL2024_RFA_Associations_ONG_HD.png

NGOs and non-profits

  • Calls for projects
  • Sponsorship
  • Employee volunteering, skills sponsorship
  • Regular discussion
  • Contributions to market questionnaires
  • Board seats
  • Positive impacts through numerous cultural and solidarity initiatives in various fields: business creation, integration, solidarity, young people, sport, environmental protection, etc.
  • Improving transparency
  • Contribution of cross-expertise: banking/financial and better understanding of local players
PAL2024_RFA_Secteurs_HD.png

Academic and research sector

  • Relations and partnerships with business schools and universities
  • Participation in forums and events
  • Discussions and consultations with scientific experts
  • Recruitment of work-study students and interns
  • Improving the employer brand
  • Contribution to the Group’s research, working groups and strategies

 

1.2.3Sponsorship policy - partnerships

Banque Palatine’s philanthropic commitment, solidarity actions and sponsorship are carried out jointly by the General Secretariat (CSR Department) and the Communications Department. The guidelines and policies of their commitments are coordinated at the national level and are then rolled out nationally and for certain local actions, at the regional level.

Banque Palatine’s policy in terms of partnerships and sponsorship is based on three priority areas: gender equality, sport and culture. Banque Palatine promotes gender equality in sport (equality between men and women and between able-bodied athletes and para-athletes) through various initiatives, such as the Palatine Women Project, support for athletes via the French Sports Foundation and sponsorship of the Alice Milliat Foundation. Banque Palatine also supports the cultural sector in France. This is reflected in particular by its cultural sponsorship with regional contemporary art structures (the Museum of Contemporary Art of Lyon, Bordeaux, Nantes and FRAC Sud de Marseille) and the Opéra-Comique in Paris, as well as its partnership with Série Séries and the creation of the Gloria Palatine Prize, designed to support the audiovisual industry and highlight gender equality in this sector.

Banque Palatine also supports Cancer@work, a charity that works to raise awareness about cancer in the workplace, and the Gustave Roussy Institute. Some employees took part in Odyssea (a race organised to raise funds for the fight against breast cancer) and Movember (an organisation that raises awareness of men's health issues and donates funds to charities working in this field), which enabled the bank to make several donations to the charity.

In addition, as part of the microgiving campaign, Banque Palatine donates the equivalent of the rounded-up amounts from salaries to charities: the Institut Curie and the Fondation des Femmes.

Measures implemented or continued in 2024

Banque Palatine, a premium partner of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games, has been supporting several athletes and para-athletes since 2021 as part of the Performance Pact program, a French Sports Foundation scheme supported by the French Ministry of Sports. This programme seeks to help French athletes succeed by providing them with an income and thus supporting their life plans (training, social and professional integration, equipment purchases, travel for sporting events, etc.) through sponsorship. Banque Palatine sponsored four athletes in 2024: Gaëlle Edon in para shooting sports, Élodie Clouvel in modern pentathlon, Nicolas Muller in golf and Alexandre Léauté in para cycling. Banque Palatine selected a gender-balanced team with two women and two men, and two able-bodied athletes and two para-athletes. In total, three sponsored athletes took part in the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games and won four medals. Banque Palatine has decided to continue its commitment to French athletes by renewing this programme in 2025.

Banque Palatine, which is committed alongside entrepreneurs, has created a mentoring programme to support high-level female athletes and para-athletes who have an entrepreneurial project. In 2024, the third edition of the “Palatine Women Project” programme supported five athletes: Myriam Benadda, Aude Bredel, Maé-Bérénice Méité, Malia Metella and Audrey Prieto. A total of 16 athletes have participated in the programme since its launch and have been backed by a community of Banque Palatine employees, institutions and businesses to help them achieve their goals. Banque Palatine has mobilised institutions such as URSSAF, the Ministry of Sport, and companies such as Uniqlo and Education First through this programme to create an active community supporting female entrepreneurs in sport.

In 2021, Banque Palatine became the leading sponsor of the Alice Milliat Foundation, the first European foundation to promote women’s sport. Created in response to gender inequality in sport, it is part of the Fondation de France and is recognised as being an organisation in the public interest. The Alice Milliat Foundation helps raise the profile of women's sport and give women a more prominent place in the sporting world.

Banque Palatine's sponsorship enables the financing of grassroots initiatives, raises awareness of women's sport and boosts the visibility of female athletes in society. In this context, Banque Palatine took part in the Festival des Sporting en Lumière organised in Nice in 2024. Its aim is to showcase the latest productions featuring sportswomen. Banque Palatine is also the leading sponsor of the Trophées Alice Milliat, which aims to highlight female sports players in France. This ceremony was attended by over 300 participants, including ministers and members of the media....

Banque Palatine has been involved in cultural sponsorship in different regions of France since 2023. It has become a sponsor of the contemporary art museums in Lyon, Nantes and Bordeaux, and of FRAC Sud in Marseille, to help boost innovation and excellence in contemporary art in these regions. It has also become a sponsor of the Opéra-Comique – Théâtre national de Paris, a beacon of French creativity. These commitments were renewed in 2024. These cultural sponsorships support creation and artistic excellence as well as access to culture for all. This sponsorship also has a social and educational purpose, as it enables organisations to develop their offerings for all audiences: children, retirees, disadvantaged groups, people with disabilities, etc. In addition, this commitment is reflected by developing local artistic activities for the bank's customers, giving real meaning to the slogan "the art of being a banker".

As a long-standing partner of the Série Séries, Banque Palatine wanted to intensify its involvement in 2022 with the creation of the Gloria Palatine prize. This prize seeks to encourage and promote greater representation of women in the audiovisual sector, both at the heart of the creative process and/or in the themes explored in the work. Banque Palatine has awarded the winning writer-producer duo a prize of €5,000 every year since 2022. This partnership demonstrates Banque Palatine’s strong commitment to gender equality in the audiovisual industry, particularly in writing and production functions.

Future work

Banque Palatine is continuing its commitment to top-level athletes, as part of the Palatine Women Project. The programme is growing every year, with 50 applications received for the 2025 edition. The number of sponsored athletes will therefore be increased for this new session.

Banque Palatine also remains committed to the French Sports Foundation and has formed its new Team of four athletes: Alexandre Léauté, para-cyclist; Élodie Clouvel, pentathlete; Ugo Coussaud, golfer; and Gaëlle Edon, para-athlete specialising in shooting sports.

Finally, Banque Palatine is renewing its commitment to the French Golf Federation in order to promote the sport and make it accessible to as many people as possible.

As part of the CSR roadmap of the Palatine 2030 strategic plan, Banque Palatine is committed to developing partnerships with local charities and stakeholders in projects that have a positive social impact.

In particular, the bank wants to:

  • strengthen its support for mentoring female athletes who want assistance in developing their entrepreneurial projects by setting up a dedicated endowment fund;
  • maintain its commitments to the fight against cancer through Odyssea, Gustave Roussy, cancer at work, etc.;
  • increase its participation in projects related to biodiversity;
  • maintain its commitments to art and culture.
1.3Governance
1.3.1GOV 1 - The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

This section is described in detail in chapter 1.3 - Corporate governance.

1.3.2GOV 2 - Information provided to the company’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies and sustainability issues addressed by them
1.3.2.1Sustainability topics addressed by the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
Organisation of governance relating to Banque Palatine’s sustainability issues

Banque Palatine's decision-making bodies incorporate transparency, ethical behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests and the principle of legality. They also take the duty of care regarding CSR actions into account.

Sustainability issues come within the remit of two bodies within Banque Palatine: the General Secretariat (CSR Department) and the Sustainable Finance Programme. The General Secretary and the Programme Director both report to executive management or deputy executive management and are members of Banque Palatine’s Executive Management Committee and are invited to attend the Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee validates the ESG strategy, ensures its implementation and oversees risk management (the composition and diversity of the Committees and Board of Directors, and of executive governance, the roles and responsibilities of the bodies are detailed in chapter 1.3 - Corporate Governance).

The Board of Directors meets as often as the company’s interests and legal and regulatory provisions require, and at least once per quarter. Several specialised committees have been set up by the Supervisory Board and carry out their activities under its responsibility. Their duties are defined in the Board of Directors’ internal rules. The Chairman of each of these committees reports on the committee’s work to the Board.

Various CSR topics are submitted to the Board of Directors for information and decisions. The following were presented in 2024: the previous year's published statement on non-financial performance, the launch of work on the CSRD, updates on the drafting of the sustainability report, the stakeholder questionnaire and its results, a review of Banque Palatine's actions in relation to biodiversity and corporate sponsorship, the CSR and sustainable finance projects of the new Palatine 2030 strategic plan presented at a Board of Directors seminar and to the Board, and the CSRD audit plan. The workplace equality policy was also discussed.

These subjects were presented in advance respectively to the Risk Committee for the statement on non-financial performance and to the Audit Committee for the sustainability report.

In terms of governance, CSR topics are monitored:

  • quarterly in the Executive Management Committee (around 15 directors representing the bank’s main business lines) and in particular for the update of the UP 2024 strategic plan, which identified non-financial indicators on topics relating to gender equality, sustainable financial savings and the carbon footprint;
  • regularly in the Executive Committee (e.g. approval to engage the bank in a CSR certification process, sponsorship, etc.).
1.3.3GOV 3 - Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
Concerning the members of the Board of Directors of Banque Palatine

Sustainability performance is not taken into account in the calculation of board members' remuneration, as presented in chapter 1.3 of the corporate governance report.

Concerning the effective managers who are members of executive management

The remuneration of the Chief Executive Officer and the Deputy Chief Executive Officer:

  • A fixed remuneration which primarily reflects professional experience related to the position held and the responsibilities exercised, and is determined by comparison to market practices.
  • annual variable remuneration, 40% of which is indexed to quantitative criteria (net revenue before tax, COEX and net result, Group share), 20% to criteria linked to BPCE's results and 40% to qualitative criteria, which can amount to, when the targets are met, 80% of the fixed remuneration for the Chief Executive Officer (50% for the Deputy Chief Executive Officer) and up to 100% of this same base amount (62.5% for the Deputy Chief Executive Officer) in the event of outperformance. These criteria are shared by the members of the Executive Committee and the Executive Management Committee.

The award of annual variable remuneration partly depends on the implementation of the bank's CSR goals. In recent years, CSR indicators have been: the professional equality index (5%), the increase in SRI outstandings (10%), the share of impact loans, including green loans in the production of corporate loans (10%), the employee engagement rate (5%), assessment of the green strategy (5%), NPS rate (10%).

The Board of Directors, through its Remuneration Committee, is responsible for setting the method and amount of remuneration for each effective manager. It ensures that CSR issues are fully integrated into the remuneration policy.

1.3.4GOV 5 - Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
Main features of the risk management and internal control system linked to the sustainability reporting procedure
1.3.4.1Preparation and publication of sustainability information
Roles and responsibilities

The development and processing of sustainability information within Banque Palatine is mainly the responsibility of the following three departments:

  • General Secretariat including the CSR and Financial Communication Department;
  • Sustainable Finance Programme.

The General Secretariat, and more specifically the CSR Department, played a key role in coordinating the work of preparing the CSRD sustainability report:

  • coordination of project committee and governance internally, including interaction with other Group entities that prepare their own sustainability report;
  • enhanced coordination of the processes for producing the regulatory indicators required by the ESRS, including a test system involving all production entities;
  • interaction with auditors.

The General Secretariat is responsible for financial communication. Its main duties are:

  • coordinating and producing presentations of quarterly results, the financial structure and the development of the Group’s business lines to enable third parties to form an opinion on its financial strength, profitability and outlook;
  • coordinating and preparing the presentation of regulated financial information (annual and half-yearly report) filed with the French Financial Markets Authority (AMF).

In the context of preparing the sustainability report, the General Secretariat plays a key role in coordinating the work undertaken by all contributing departments. It participates in the management of the project and is involved in three major projects:

Acculturatiuon to the CSRD and dialogue with stakeholders, co-led with the Sustainable Finance Programme: ​

  • first objective of this area: to present and train the bank’s employees involved in the production of the sustainability report. To this end, educational materials were provided and training sessions were held to support the contributing business lines and entities;
  • second objective: develop specific tools, such as questionnaires, to collect stakeholders' expectations regarding sustainability issues and thus strengthen trust and relationships with them.

The effective management of the sustainability report production process

The General Secretariat proposes, validates and implements the ESG strategy with the Sustainable Finance Programme. ​It plays a cross-functional role, carrying out the following key missions:

  • co-constructs the Palatine 2030 strategic plan for the Impact section on the E, S and G aspect;
  • develops and deploys ESG expertise and ensures that the Group is represented and communicates in the market;
  • conducts and interprets scientific and competitive monitoring and supports regulatory monitoring;
  • ensures overall coordination and supports each business line while implementing the necessary synergies.

The General Secretariat and the Sustainable Finance Programme are more specifically involved in the following projects:

  • CSRD acculturation: a meeting to present the CSRD directive and its challenges, in particular for medium-sized corporate customers, was organised in June 2024, led by an expert in these subjects, with the Marketing Department and the sales representatives of the Corporate and Private Banking markets. Furthermore, a training/acculturation meeting was planned for September for all employees in the Project Team as part of the CSRD Project structure put in place in July 2024. The purpose of this meeting was to provide a background and perspective on the CSRD project, to explain the regulatory and strategic expectations of the directive, to shed light on certain new structuring concepts and their implementation, and to share the project organisation put in place at the Banque Palatine level to implement the CSRD and share best practices, next steps and the tools/resources made available to us by the Group and within Banque Palatine;
  • double materiality analysis: this analysis was carried out in two stages, managed exclusively by the General Secretariat (for a detailed description, see ESRS2 IRO1);
  • the identification of impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO) relevant to the bank’s activity was coordinated by the General Secretariat by drawing on the bank’s business lines. The identification of the IROs was carried out in two phases, A and B, by the General Secretariat respectively. Phase A enabled the topics and subtopics of the ESRS relevant to Groupe BPCE to be identified through workshops with internal business line experts, and then to carry out an initial identification of the IROs. The final list of IROs relevant to the bank was drawn up during phase B;
  • assessment of the materiality of these IROs: BPCE's Impact Management Department has established a methodology for rating IROs for the Group. This rating process was coordinated and supervised by the General Secretariat, in liaison with the internal stakeholders mentioned above. The business lines and functional departments are responsible for rating the IROs within their scope;
  • communication strategy and editorial content: the General Secretariat is responsible for the bank's Impact strategy and ensures that the editorial content of the sustainability report is relevant and consistent with the bank's strategy on sustainability issues;
  • transition plan: Palatine does not have its own transition plan for this first financial year.
Methods for producing and publishing sustainability reports

The central body prepares the sustainability report in accordance with the requirements defined by the CSRD directive (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive).

It also ensures that the rules defined by the Group are properly applied by the bodies subject to this requirement and checks compliance with these requirements.

To ensure the reliability of the production process, the central body uses:

  • a project structure dedicated to the publication of sustainability statements and distributed to all Group entities;
  • a process for consolidating all the information to be published in the sustainability report, including controls to ensure the consistency of the information published and the analyses;
  • a complete body of documentation;
  • a harmonised permanent control framework, the organisation of which is described in the following section (GOV-5 - 1.3.4.2).
1.3.4.2General organisation of permanent control
General system

The internal control framework defined by the Group contributes to the control of risks of all kinds and is governed by a governing charter – the Group Internal Control Charter – which stipulates that this system is designed, in particular, to ensure “[...] the reliability of financial and non-financial information reported both inside and outside the Group”.

The Group has defined and implemented a permanent control framework to ensure the quality of this information, in accordance with the requirements defined by the order of 3 November 2014 on internal control, or any other regulatory obligations relating to the quality of reports, and in particular for the publication of information on sustainability.

This permanent control framework is set up within Banque Palatine. In order to ensure strict independence in the implementation of controls, the permanent control framework is based on two levels of controls:

  • a first level exercised by all those involved in the production and reporting process;
  • a second level carried out by the Financial Control unit attached to the bank's Risk Management and Compliance Department.

CSRD reporting has been included in this control framework since 1 January 2025 to ensure compliance with the requirements defined by:

  • the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD),
  • the Group within the Framework for developing and publishing reports and management indicators, which aims to harmonise reporting practices within the Group.

The bank’s business lines that produce information for CRSD reporting are: Finance, Risks, Compliance, Human Resources, Sustainable Finance, Purchases and General Secretariat. As a prerequisite for implementing CRSD reporting controls, the production process will have been modelled, identifying sub-processes and their respective specialists.

First-level control framework

The production specialist, in conjunction with the contributors, will implement a first-level Self Assessment grid (BCBS239 terminology) (Lod1) which covers the following items:

  • existence of group and Palatine documentation of the CSRD production (procedures and/or operating methods, etc.);
  • existence of self-checking and hierarchical validation procedures;
  • performance of the first-level controls planned;
  • formalisation of the results of these first-level controls;
  • in the event of anomalies identified, existence of remediation plans to resolve them on a long-term basis.

The first-level controls to be implemented by contributors notably concern:

  • the existence of audit trails for the creation of indicators;
  • reconciliation with the financial statements, if applicable;
  • analysis of changes;
  • the quality of the sources (special attention must be paid to office and manual sources) and the accuracy of the data collected from external suppliers;
  • the existence of limitations, i.e. degraded procedures for the production of certain indicators;
  • the inclusion of these limitations in the CSRD report.
A Second-level control framework: the independent review of the CRSD report

Financial Control will carry out a second-level independent review of the report based on the implementation of strict criteria. This review, organised to ensure that the regulatory requirements are met, mainly aims to obtain an opinion or reasonable assurance that the reports are produced and published in a satisfactory internal control environment and that they include reliable, clear useful and auditable data.

This second-level control takes the form of a standardised Group Self Assessment grid (Lod2) based on six analysis areas weighted from 1 to 3 and covering:

  • the quality of the documentation;
  • the robustness of the organisation relating to the production and publication of the report;
  • the quality of the audit trail of the data and/or indicators included in the reporting;
  • the effectiveness of the system of first-level controls;
  • the accuracy of the data and/or indicators published and their consistency with the information provided in other publications;
  • the clarity of the information

Weighting of each criterion

Documentation

1

Organisation

1

Clarity

2

Auditability

2

Control

2

Accuracy

3

 

These controls are implemented according to a group rating method which scores the results of the controls on a scale between 1 (requirement not met) and 4 (requirement fully met):

 

Rating scale for the quality of the report

1

from 1 to 1.9

Requirement not met

2

from 2 to 2.9

Requirement very partially met

3

from 3 to 3.9

Requirement correctly met but to be improved

4

> = to 3.9

Requirement fully met

 

The results of these controls are formalised and reported in a summary note which is included in the Lod2 grid. This note presents, without being exhaustive, the work carried out as part of its controls and the conclusions of this work, specifying in particular the anomalies identified and, where applicable, the recommendations issued (or action plans or corrective measures).

The results are integrated, by criterion, into the Group's permanent control tool (Priscop) and the conclusions are shared with the units audited, external control bodies (statutory auditors in particular) and the Banque Palatine's Internal Control Coordination Committee and Audit Committee.

The implementation of corrective actions (recommendations issued) and/or identified areas for improvement is monitored in conjunction with the business lines and after the publication of the Group's sustainability report in order to strengthen the system for subsequent publications. This monitoring is reported to Banque Palatine's Coordination Committee for Internal Control Functions and Audit Committee.

Main features of the environmental, social and governance risk management system

The environmental, social and governance risk management system is described in detail in chapter 4 of the 2024 Risk Management Report.

Definition of ESG risks
Environmental risks

Environmental risks fall into two main categories:

  • Physical risks arising from the impacts of extreme or chronic climate or environment events (biodiversity, pollution, water, natural resources) on the activities of Groupe BPCE or its counterparties;
  • Transition risks arising from the impacts of the transition to a low-carbon economy, or one with a lower environmental impact, on Groupe BPCE or its counterparties, including regulatory changes, technological developments, and the behaviour of stakeholders (including consumers).
Social risks

Social risks arise from the impacts of social factors on Groupe BPCE’s counterparties, including issues related to the rights, well-being and interests of individuals and stakeholders (the company’s workforce, employees of the company's value chain, communities concerned, end-users and final consumers).

Governance risks

Governance risks arise from the impacts of governance factors on Groupe BPCE’s counterparties, including in particular issues related to ethics and corporate culture (governance structure, business integrity and transparency, etc.), supplier relationship management, influence activities and business practices.

ESG risk management framework deployment program

The ESG Risk Department coordinates the implementation of the ESG risk management system at Groupe BPCE level through a dedicated program. This program, initiated in 2021, was reviewed and strengthened during 2024 in line with Groupe BPCE’s climate and environmental commitments within the framework of the Vision 2030 strategic plan and the regulatory requirements. It defines a multi-year action plan aligned with the timeframe of the strategic plan (2024-2026). It is directly linked to the strategy and actions implemented by the Impact program. This programme is monitored quarterly by the ESG Risk Committee, Groupe BPCE’s Supervisory Board and the European supervisor.

This programme is based on the following four themes:

  • ESG risk governance: committee procedure, roles and responsibilities, remuneration;
  • strengthening knowledge of risks: monitoring systems, sector analyses and assessments, risk benchmarks, risk analysis methodologies and processes, data;
  • the operational integration of the work: in coordination with other functions within the Risk Management Department, taking ESG risk factors into account in their respective management systems and decision-making processes;
  • consolidated risk management mechanisms: dashboards, contributions to RAF/ICAAP/ILAAP systems, training and acculturation plan for board members, senior executives and employees, contribution to extra-financial communication.

The execution of this programme mobilises the main internal stakeholders in terms of ESG risks, in particular the Impact Department, the teams and functions of the other departments of the Risk Management Department, the Finance Department and the Compliance Department, as well as the Groupe BPCE business lines, in particular the departments in charge of developing sustainable finance activities.

Integration of ESG risks into the risk management framework

Based on specific ESG risk assessment methodologies, Groupe BPCE is gradually integrating ESG risk factors into its operational decisions through the existing systems in the bank’s main risk functions.

The process of identifying and assessing climate risks and the associated action plans are described in chapter E1 - Climate change (in sections 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.3.4 respectively).

Reputational and/or litigation risks and liability risks have been identified as material in the chapters Climate change, Workers in the value chain, Affected communities and Customers and end-users, and are covered by the following sections:

Reputational risk

The growing awareness and sensitivity of citizens and economic players to environmental, social and governance issues is leading to increased exposure to reputational risks related to these topics.

Faced with these risks, Groupe BPCE relies on a reputational risk management system overseen by the Groupe BPCE Risk Management Department and structured around the Group Reputation Risk Committee, which is tasked with reviewing the most sensitive issues at Groupe BPCE level.

This system is based on the measures implemented in the decision-making processes in order to assess reputational risks and implement mitigation measures if necessary. This concerns in particular:

  • the responsible purchasing policy, which requires knowledge and assessment of suppliers’ ESG risks, and the implementation of a carbon clause in supplier contracts since 2024,
  • the new products / new activities (NPNA) system concerning the characteristics and communication related to Groupe BPCE’s products and activities, which includes a systematic opinion from the ESG Risk Department;
  • the application of sector CSR policies as part of the new relationship, credit and investment processes.

In addition, a system for monitoring the Group’s ESG reputation has been set up, conducting monthly monitoring of the main controversies related to ESG issues that have involved Groupe BPCE and their impact on its overall reputational score. This monitoring is presented quarterly to the ESG Risk Committee.

Groupe BPCE plans to continue to enhance these systems in the course of 2025, in particular by defining a framework for monitoring voluntary commitments and strengthening its reputational risk management system.

Litigation risks

The environmental, social and governance issues are likely to lead to litigation risks for Groupe BPCE. These can be based on legal foundations specific to the ESG issues (duty of care, international treaties or European legislation on the climate and the environment), on broader principles applied in this context (competition law, consumer law, criminal law), or unilateral commitments made by Groupe BPCE.

Groupe BPCE has identified and integrated into its operational risk mapping three main litigation and liability risk situations specifically related to ESG issues:

  • Communication using the ecological/ sustainable argument in a misleading manner (Greenwashing);
  • Non-compliance with the voluntary commitments made by Groupe BPCE or voluntary commitments deemed insufficient;
  • Controversial activities of Groupe BPCE or its entities, customers and/or suppliers.

As for the reputational risks, the risk management relating to these three situations is based on a set of measures integrated into the Group’s main decision-making processes.

In addition, Groupe BPCE’s Legal Department also defines and disseminates best practices in terms of communication on climate and environmental issues and supports Groupe BPCE entities’ business lines and functions in their implementation in internal and external communication.

 

1.3.5GOV 4 - Statement on due diligence

The table below maps the information concerning the due diligence procedure included in Banque Palatine's sustainability report.

Core elements of due diligence

Sections in the statement relating to sustainability

a) Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model

1.2.1.1 / 1.2.1.2 / 1.3.2

b) Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the reasonable due diligence.

1.2.2

c) Identifying and assessing adverse impacts

1.4.1 / 2.2.2.1

d) Taking actions to address those adverse impacts

2.2.3.1 / 2.2.3.4 / 3.2.3.3 / 3.2.3.4 / 3.4.3.3 / 3.4.3.4

e) Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating

2.2.3.10 / 2.2.4.1 / 3.2.4.1 / 3.4.4.1

 

1.4Impact, risk and opportunity management
1.4.1Disclosures on the materiality assessment process
1.4.1.1IRO 1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
1.4.1.1.1Definition of double materiality

The double materiality exercise is the starting point for the preparation of the sustainability report.

Double materiality has two dimensions: i) materiality from an impact point of view and ii) materiality from a financial point of view.

Impact materiality
Impact of the company’s activities on the environment and society

The CSRD introduces the concept of double materiality, which aims to take into account both impact materiality and financial materiality:

PAL2024_RFA_EN_I018_HD.png

The impacts, risks and opportunities identified as material represent the material issues on which the content of the sustainability report is based.

1.4.1.1.2Methodology for identifying and rating impacts, risks and opportunities

From an operational standpoint, the double materiality exercise was carried out for the first application of the CSRD in four stages:

  • identification of impacts, risks and opportunities relevant to Groupe BPCE’s business and its entire value chain;
  • recovery of the impacts, risks and opportunities identified by Groupe BPCE and relevant to Banque Palatine’s business;
  • identification of IROs specific to the activity of Banque Palatine, Palatine Asset Management and Ariès;
  • assessment of the materiality of these impacts, risks and opportunities.
Methodology for identifying impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO)

The identification of IROs is the initial step in defining the scope of activities on which Groupe BPCE and its subsidiaries (including Banque Palatine) must publish information in its sustainability report. A list of IROs relevant to activities throughout the value chain (including upstream and downstream) must be determined at the end of this stage in order to rate them.

The identification of IROs was carried out by topic and subtopic as defined in ESRS 1 (AR 16):

  • Topics and subtopics: The identification of topics and subtopics was carried out by mobilising internal sources, such as the ESG issues identified in Groupe BPCE’s 2022 and 2023 SNFP reports, the due diligence process put in place by the Group as part of the Duty of Care plan and the mapping of existing risks, supplemented by external sources, such as the analysis of a sector benchmark, with a focus on the most relevant issues for banking players. Following this identification of an initial list of topics and sub-topics, additional work was carried out to align with CSRD requirements. This alignment was carried out in two stages through workshops involving in-house business experts to (i) validate the list of topics and sub-topics according to experts, and (ii) reconcile ESG issues with ESRS themes for the E, S and G components (AR 16 of ESRS 1);
  • Impacts, Risks and Opportunities (IRO): Once the list of topics and subtopics was drawn up and aligned with the ESRS standards, work to identify the IROs within each topic was carried out to cover both the impact materiality and the financial materiality. Several internal and external sources were used to identify IROs.

For each IRO identified, a prequalification was carried out for their rating. This prequalification consisted of:

  • 1/positioning each IRO in Groupe BPCE’s value chain, i.e. upstream, within its own activities, or downstream,
  • 2/defining the potential or actual nature of the negative and positive impacts.
Process for identifying and assessing impacts, risks and opportunities related to E2-Pollution, E3-Water and marine resources, E4-Biodiversity, E5-Resource use and circular economy.

The process of identifying the impacts of environmental issues, excluding climate change, at Groupe BPCE level was carried out across the entire value chain. Impacts have been identified on own operations and on financing and asset management operations.

The rating of these impacts was conducted according to experts. The rating for financing and asset management activities was based in large part on a sectoral analysis of Groupe BPCE's exposures conducted by the Group ESG Risk Department as part of the assessment of the scale. This rating was strengthened by the mobilisation of the views of the Group’s stakeholders.

The process of identifying and assessing environmental risks, excluding climate, is part of the same system for assessing the materiality of climate and environmental risks set up by Groupe BPCE.

With regard to opportunities, the identification and assessment process was carried out by experts taking into account economic changes related to environmental issues, excluding climate change, and Groupe BPCE’s outlook to adapt its banking, insurer and investor business models.

Consideration of the value chain in the identification of Banque Palatine's IROs

The activities of Banque Palatine and its entire upstream and downstream value chain were taken into account in the double materiality analysis. The following guidelines were adopted in view of the specific nature of Banque Palatine's business segment:

  • 1/Mapping its activities and the players in the value chain to identify which players are in risk areas;
  • 2/Carrying out an analysis by major families of players: customers, suppliers, subcontractors, etc.;
  • 3/Broadening its analysis beyond first-level and direct business relationships: in addition to the major groups of direct players in the value chain, the business lines have taken the entire environment surrounding them into account, particularly through sector analyses.
Organisation in terms of identifying impacts, risks and opportunities

The identification of IROs was coordinated by and under the responsibility of the General Secretariat (CSR Department). The Resources and Work Environment, Risk and Compliance, Sustainable Finance, Communication, Sales and Finance teams, as well as the two subsidiaries Palatine Asset Management and Ariès, helped to formalise and assess these IROs.

Process for rating impacts, risks and opportunities

Among all the IROs identified in the first stage, the rating of the impacts, risks and opportunities led to the designation of those that are material from an impact point of view or from a financial point of view, and which are therefore presented in this sustainability report.

Methodology for rating impacts, risks and opportunities
Description of the rating criteria

The ESRS impose criteria for assessing the materiality of IROs. These criteria may be different depending on whether an impact (negative or positive), a risk or an opportunity is concerned.

  • 1/The negative impacts are rated according to two dimensions:
    • i. probability: this involves assessing the probability that Banque Palatine will have a negative impact on the subject identified
    • ii. severity composed of:
      • 1. magnitude: the severity of the negative impact on people or the environment;
      • 2. extent: the scope of the negative impacts. In the case of an environmental impact, the extent may refer to the extent of the damage caused to the environment or a geographic area. In the case of impacts on the population, the extent may refer to the number of people affected by the impact;
      • 3. irremediable nature: assessing whether, and to what extent, the negative impacts can be remedied.

Significant: In the event of a potential negative impact on human rights, the severity of the impact outweighs its probability.

  • 1/The positive impacts are rated according to three dimensions:
    • i. probability: this involves assessing the probability that Groupe BPCE will have a positive impact on the subject identified;
    • ii. magnitude: the beneficial effect of the impact on people or the environment;
    • iii. extent: the scope of the impact (e.g. on a geographical or demographic scale).
  • 2/The risks and opportunities are rated according to two dimensions:
    • i. probability of occurrence: probability of the risk or opportunity occurring;
    • ii. magnitude of the financial impact: measurement of the potential financial effects.

All IROs were the subject of a gross rating, i.e. without taking the action plans implemented by the Group to prevent, mitigate or remedy them into consideration.

Rating scales

Rating scales are not prescribed by the ESRS. They have been defined by and for Groupe BPCE, its sites and subsidiaries. Each rating criterion was assessed on a scale from 1 to 4.

 

PAL2024_RFA_EN_I019_HD.png
Score and final rating of impacts, risks and opportunities

Each impact, risk and opportunity was rated, based on the criteria and scales described above.

Determination of the materiality threshold

Materiality threshold refers to the score or rating based on which impacts, risks and opportunities are material.

Banque Palatine's materiality threshold is defined by Groupe BPCE's "CSRD Project" Steering Committee.

Materiality threshold

As part of the harmonisation of the rating scales defined for the criteria, a rating scale has also been defined for the rating level of impacts, risks and opportunities. This scale consists of four levels:

  • 1/Low;
  • 2/Moderate;
  • 3/High;
  • 4/Very high.
  •  
PAL2024_RFA_EN_I020_HD.png

 

An impact, risk or opportunity is material when the rating level is greater than or equal to 3, corresponding to a high or very high level.

Organisation in terms of rating impacts, risks and opportunities
Operating procedure for rating IROs

Groupe BPCE’s Impact Department proposed the methodological approach for rating IROs as part of the CSRD Project.

Workshops were held with the institutions (Banques Populaires and Caisses d’Epargne) as well as with the global business lines, BPCE Assurances and Banque Palatine to discuss structuring options for the rating of IROs and to co-construct a common approach.

A Group operating procedure was prepared and shared with the representatives of the institutions (Banques Populaires, Caisses d’Epargne, BPCE) as well as with the subsidiaries.

Role of the functional departments

Several functional departments were called upon as part of the rating of the IROs. These notably include:

  • the Compliance Department;
  • the Human Resources Department;
  • the Purchasing Department;
  • the Technology and Operations Department;
  • the Climate and Environmental Risk Department;
  • the Operational Risk Department,
  • the Impact Department.
Rating of Environmental Impacts via financing and investments

The rating of the environmental impacts in connection with financing and investments was carried out, based on expert opinion, by the Impact Department, Retail Banking, BPCE Assurances and GFS based on a sectoral analysis of Groupe BPCE’s exposures carried out by the Group Risk Management Department as part of the assessment of the scale. This analysis focuses on the impact of 26 business sectors on various environmental issues (mitigation and adaptation to climate change, pollution, biodiversity, aquatic and marine resources and the circular economy). A three-level scale is applied to each business segment depending on the criticality of its impact on each environmental issue:

  • “strong” impact,
  • “moderate” impact,
  • “low” impact.

This information is used to score the “Magnitude” criterion of the negative impacts identified by Groupe BPCE:

  • 1/No or very little impact when exposure to “strong” segments is between 0% and 15%;
  • 2/Significant: when exposure to “strong” segments is between 15% and 50%;
  • 3/High: when exposure to “strong” segments is between 50% and 75%;
  • 4/Very high: when the exposure to “strong” segments exceeds 75%.

This rating was subject to additional reviews by experts in order to streamline the quantitative analysis and to cover all of the Group’s exposures, taking into account:

  • 1/the scale of the environmental impacts of other segments beyond the 26 business segments analysed by the ESG Risk Department;
  • 2/additional exposures to those obtained by the ESG Risk Department (exposures to individual retail, the public sector and exposures to financial institutions).

The other criteria, scope, irremediable nature and probability, were assessed on an expert basis taking into account the rating scales defined for all impacts.

Rating of environmental risks via financing and investments

The rating of environmental risks was carried out by the ESG Risk Department on the basis of the materiality assessment of climate and environmental risks conducted annually by Groupe BPCE since 2021. The latter aims to qualify the materiality of climate and environmental, physical or transition, short-, medium- and long-term risks in relation to the “traditional” risks to which Groupe BPCE is exposed (according to the risk taxonomy defined within Groupe BPCE’s Risk Appetite Framework, e.g. credit risk, market risk, operational risk, etc.).

This annual process is based on scientific knowledge (scenarios, assessment tools) and knowledge bases (e.g. Business Environment Scan), measures and internal indicators available at the date of completion of the financial year, as well as on the expertise of all internal parties involved in the risk management system (LoD1 or LoD2). The assessments are carried out on the gross risk. It is subject to a continuous improvement process concerning the underlying processes and methods.

As part of the assessment of the financial materiality of the CSRD risks, the assessment of the materiality of climate and environmental risks was cross-referenced with the materiality assessment of each of the “traditional” risks. This assessment is carried out annually as part of the work on the Risk Appetite Framework in order to obtain an assessment of the intrinsic materiality for each IRO on the same criteria as the other IROs (probability of occurrence/magnitude of impact), to ensure consistency between the different exercises. An expert’s overall consistency check was carried out to validate the materiality levels obtained.

To date, Groupe BPCE’s rating of environmental risks (biodiversity, water, pollution and circular economy) has been applied uniformly to all these environmental topics. The work undertaken by Groupe BPCE to strengthen the climate and environmental risk management system will gradually refine this analysis.

Process for validating the ratings of impacts, risks and opportunities

The validation of the IRO is carried out through workshops bringing together:

  • representatives of the business lines concerned by each topic, subtopic and each Purchasing, Human Resources, Operational Risks IRO, etc.;
  • sponsors of the institutions (four Banques Populaires, four Caisses d’Epargne);
  • the ESG Risk Department;
  • the CSR representatives of the global business lines, BPCE Assurances, Banque Palatine, BRED, Crédit Coopératif, FSE and Digital & Payments;
  • the Group Impact Department.
Stakeholder consultation process

Although stakeholder consultation is not mandatory as part of the double materiality exercise, Banque Palatine considered it important to consult its board members, employees and some of its customers using various means, including permanent feedback systems and the use of specific tools, as they play a key role in providing relevant information for publication on sustainability issues, by drawing on their wide-ranging expertise.

1.4.1.1.3Consolidation process

The process for identifying and rating Groupe BPCE’s IROs was performed in three stages:

  • recovery of the impacts, risks and opportunities identified by Groupe BPCE and relevant to Banque Palatine’s business;
  • identification of IROs specific to the activity of Banque Palatine, Palatine Asset Management and Ariès;
  • assessment of the materiality of these impacts, risks and opportunities.
1.4.1.1.4Review process

In accordance with the CSRD transposed into French law, the sustainability report is prepared annually. As a result, and as specified by EFRAG in its guidance on double materiality, Banque Palatine must determine the list of material IROs every year. However, if Banque Palatine concludes, on the basis of audit evidence, that the results of the double materiality exercise for the previous financial year are still relevant at the reporting date, it can use the conclusions obtained previously to prepare the sustainability report. This is the case when Banque Palatine believes that there have been no significant changes in its organisational and operational structure and that there have been no significant changes in external factors that could generate new IROs or change existing IROs or could affect their relevance.

In addition, every year Banque Palatine will be required to verify the following items and facts (non-exhaustive list), which may trigger a revision of the list of material IROs:

  • A major merger-acquisition transaction leading to a new activity, an entry into a new sector or a significant change in operations;
  • A global event, such as a pandemic, a natural disaster;
  • A change in Banque Palatine’s business model;
  • A change in social conventions, scientific evidence or user needs that could affect the severity criteria.

 

1.4.1.1.5List of material IROs shared with Groupe BPCE
Environment
Climate change (ESRS E1)

 

Sub-theme

Sub-sub-topic

Type of IRO

Own activity / 

Value chain

Time horizon

IRO definition

Climate change mitigation and adaptation

Climate change mitigation - operating footprint

Negative impact

Own operations

Long term

Negative impact on the climate due
 to greenhouse gas emissions from
the Group’s own operations (IT, 
fixed assets, etc.)

 

Climate change mitigation and adaptation - financing and investments

Negative impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Negative impact on the climate 
mainly due to the Group’s financing
and investments in so-called 
carbon-intensive sectors.

 

 

Opportunity

Downstream value chain

Long term

Proposals for savings products invested in companies to support 
their transition, as well as financing 
solutions to support the Group’s customers in their own transition 
and mitigate the effects of climate change.

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Long term

Risk of impairment of assets related 
to investments and financing 
exposed to physical climate risks (high-risk areas)

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Long term

Risk of financial loss related 
to financing/investments of counterparties exposed to climate transition risks.

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Medium term

Reputational risk related to financing and/or investments in companies 
with a carbon-intensive activity 
and/or incompatible with the net-
zero alignment trajectories

Social
Own workers (ESRS S1)

 

Sub-theme

Sub-sub-topic

Type of IRO

Own activity / 

Value chain

Time horizon

IRO description

Attractiveness,
employee 
loyalty and
commitment

Listening to employees 
and strengthening their commitment

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Risk of deviation from employees’ expectations due to the absence and/or inadequacy of listening systems and action plans to strengthen their commitment.

 

Integration of new hires 
and strengthening
employee loyalty

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

 

Positive impact of the employee experience contributing to 
a welcoming environment for the Group’s employees (pre-boarding, onboarding, induction programme 
and individualised training course).

 

Recruitment strategy and employer brand

Opportunity

Own operations

Medium term

Opportunity for the Group to strengthen its employer brand 
and its attractiveness on the job market with a digital (communication and prospecting on social networks, use of job boards, recruitment 
events in the regions, co-option, 
etc.) and inclusive (work-study, 
hiring of non-banking profiles, etc.) recruitment strategy.

Working 
conditions

Social dialogue (freedom 
of association and 
collective bargaining)

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

 

Positive impact on employee commitment and performance via sustained and constructive dialogue with employee representatives at Group, division and company level (regular meetings with the staff-representative bodies and conclusion of collective agreements).

 

Privacy

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Financial risk in the event of non-security of employee personal data or breach of privacy:

  • financial sanctions;
  • damages for the loss suffered.

 

Quality of life at work and risk prevention and safety 
at work

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Financial losses related to employee turnover, absenteeism and employee disengagement resulting from:

  • recruitment and training costs 
    for new employees, absences (replacement and financing of all 
    or part of the absences or medical expenses);
  • lost revenue related to the decline 
    in productivity, sales performance and customer satisfaction;
  • loss of talent.

 

 

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Financial risks for the Group 
in the event of:

  • occurrence of a workplace 
    accident (incivility, assault, 
    on the road or on the premises) and/or commuting accident;
  • financial losses and operational 
    risks related to the deterioration 
    of the health of employees 
    and/or the deterioration 
    of the quality of life at work 
    (increase in professional risks, turnover, absenteeism, loss 
    of productivity and induced costs, etc.);
  • non-compliance with the single occupational risk assessment document regulation.

 

 

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

Positive impact on the quality 
of life at work of employees (working hours, teleworking, layout of premises, work-life balance, QLWC agreement, etc.)

 

Decent pay and social protection

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

Positive impact for employees 
thanks to clear and fair 
remuneration, well understood 
by them, and exceeding legal minimums, guaranteeing adequate working conditions (basic salaries, bonuses, employee savings, 
benefits in kind, etc.) and solid 
social protection (provident 
insurance, health insurance, 
pension plan, etc.)

 

Employee health and employee job retention

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

Positive impact on employee 
working conditions for a safe 
working environment adapted 
to the well-being of employees.

Equal 
treatment and
opportunities

Skills development

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

Positive impact on the employees’ skills development.

 

 

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

 

Positive impact on the development 
of employability, employee mobility within the Group and proactive 
career management.

 

 

Opportunity

Own operations

Invariable

Opportunity for the Group 
to promote the development 
of internal skills and capitalise 
on expertise and knowledge 
in order to strengthen employee commitment (increase in 
the retention rate, reduction 
of operational risk, etc.).

 

Diversity & inclusion 
(Gender equality, disability, discrimination & harassment)

Positive impact

Own operations

Invariable

Positive impact in terms of diversity, inclusion, professional equality and support for people with disabilities.

Workers in the value chain (ESRS S2)

 

Sub-theme

Sub-sub-topic

Type of IRO

Own activity / 

Value chain

Time horizon

IRO description

Working 
conditions 
and other 
work-related
rights

Working conditions and other work-related rights 
of subcontractors, service providers and suppliers

Risk

Upstream value chain

Invariable

Risk concerning the Group’s image and reputation linked to deteriorated working conditions and non-respect of the human rights of workers in its value chain.

 

Working conditions and other work-related rights 
of workers 
in financed/invested companies

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Reputational risk due to inadequate due diligence on the social aspects of the companies that the Group finances or invests in.

 

 

Negative impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Potential negative impact 
from the Group’s activity 
to finance/invest in companies where working conditions have deteriorated.

 

Affected communities (ESRS S3)

 

Sub-theme

Sub-sub-topic

Type of IRO

Own activity / 

Value chain

Time horizon

IRO description

Communities’ economic, 
social and 
cultural rights

Financing the economy 
and regional players

Positive impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Positive impact on local economic development and regional attractiveness by creating jobs, supporting local businesses and authorities, and social housing operators, and by promoting economic growth, including 
improving the living conditions 
of stakeholders impacted by 
the Group’s local presence policies.

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Risk of image and reputation 
damage related to the financing/investment of projects 
that have a negative impact 
on communities or when they 
are not aligned with the real needs 
of society.

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Legal risk related to the financing/investment of projects having a negative impact on communities, as part of the duty of care.

Consumers and end-users (ESRS S4)

 

Sub-theme

Sub-sub-topic

Type of IRO

Activity / 

Value chain

Time horizon

IRO description

Impacts related to consumer 
and end-user information

Access to information

Positive impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Positive impact on customers via 
a transparent offer to facilitate understanding of products 
and services by all customers 
and informed decision-making, 
as part of responsible marketing.

 

Personal Data Protection and cybersecurity

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Risk of sanctions due to regulatory non-compliance related to:

  • non-compliance with customer 
    data protection regulations 
    (in particular: GDPR on data practices - consent, cookies, etc.);
  • sanctions related to the non-disclosure of cybersecurity attacks having taken place.

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Potential or proven financial losses, including related reputational risk, related to the loss of customers 
in the event of:

  • insufficient measures to prevent 
    and combat cybercrime;
  • leaks, theft or inappropriate use 
    of personal data.

 

 

Negative impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Potential negative impact on human rights in case of practices related to the misuse of customers’ personal data.

Financial 
inclusion 
and 
accessibility 
of the offer

Access to products and services and responsible marketing practices

Opportunity

Downstream value chain

Long term

 

Development of new innovative products and services, respecting responsible marketing policies, opening new markets and customer segments and partnerships 
with tech start-ups, stimulating innovation and creativity 
and increasing customer interest 
in products and services as part 
of responsible marketing.

 

 

Positive impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Positive impact with access 
to the Group’s offers and services adapted to the financial needs 
of each customer as well as global geographical coverage and thanks 
to adapted digital solutions.

 

 

Negative impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Potential negative impacts on customers in the event of abusive sales, unethical practices (including forced sales).

 

 

Positive impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Offer accessible products 
and services to all customers 
and economic players (companies, professionals, local authorities, operators of the social 
and solidarity economy), including those in financially vulnerable situations, thanks to accessibility 
and inclusion offers.

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Risk of image and reputational damage related to the inaccessibility 
or lack of readability of offers, 
thus contributing to the loss 
of customers.

 

Non-discrimination

Negative impact

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Potential negative impact: undermining the equality and inclusi
on of people if Groupe BPCE’s practices are discriminatory 
regarding the choice of customers (age, gender, nationality, etc.) or 
the access to financing or essential services provided to customers (account opening, insurance, etc.).

 

 

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Risk of image and reputational damage related to discriminatory practices, contributing to the loss 
of customers.

Governance
Business conduct (ESRS G1)

 

Sub-theme

Sub-sub-topic

Type of IRO

Activity / 

Value chain

Time horizon

IRO description

Ethics and corporate culture

Fight against corruption 
and bribery

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Financial losses due to acts of corruption or unethical behaviour within the Group.

 

 

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Reputational risk and sanctions 
due to non-compliance with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws and regulations.

 

Combat against money laundering and terrorism financing

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Risk of regulatory sanctions 
in the event of non-compliance 
with anti-money laundering 
and terrorist financing laws 
and regulations as well 
as reputational risk.

 

Protection of 
whistle-blowers

Risk

Own operations

Invariable

Reputational risk, deterioration 
of stakeholder confidence and sanctions in the event of ethically questionable practices as well as 
in the event of non-compliance 
with laws and regulations on 
the protection of whistle-blowers.

 

Compliance with 
sanctions measures (national, European or international), embargoes and asset freezes

Risk

Downstream value chain

Invariable

Risk of regulatory sanctions in 
the event of non-compliance 
with sanctions measures (national, European or international), 
embargoes and asset freezes.

Management of relationships with suppliers including payment practices

Management 
of relationships 
with suppliers including payment practices

Risk

Upstream value chain

Invariable

Reputational risk in the event of
the Group being called into 
question for negative ESG impacts (unethical practices or practices 
that derogate from human rights) caused by its suppliers and service providers.

 

 

Positive impact

Upstream value chain

Invariable

Positive impact on suppliers 
by encouraging them to adopt virtuous practices (rigorous 
selection of suppliers), by improving 
the quality of supplier relations 
and the management of payment terms.

1.4.2SBM 3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model

The material impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO) resulting from the double materiality analysis are listed in section 1.4.1.1.5 (chapter IRO-1). This description makes it possible to identify where in its business model, its own activities or its value chain these material IROs are concentrated.

In summary, the material IROs identified relate to the following topics:

  • Climate change (E1): “climate change mitigation and adaptation” for the downstream part of the value chain (through customer financing and investments) and “climate change mitigation” for own activities (in particular Premises and Real Estate, IT, Purchasing, Mobility);
  • Own workers (S1): the IROs concern the Group’s employees and cover the following three topics: “Attractiveness, employee loyalty and commitment”, “Working conditions”, “Equal treatment and opportunities”;
  • Workers in the value chain (S2): the IROs concern “Working conditions and other labour rights” and cover both the upstream value chain (suppliers) and the downstream value chain (through financing and customer investments);
  • Affected communities (S3): the identified IROs cover the topic of ‘Economic, social and cultural rights of communities’ through funding allocated to the economy and various actors in the territories (downstream value chain);
  • Customers and end-users (S4): the IROs concern the Group’s customers (downstream value chain) and are organised around the topics “Consumer and end-user information” and “Financial inclusion and accessibility of the offer”;
  • Governance (G1): the IROs relating to the topic “Ethics and corporate culture” concern employees (own operations) and “Supplier relationship management”, linked to the upstream value chain.

The business model, value chain and integration of sustainability issues into Banque Palatine’s strategy are detailed in section 1.2.1 (SBM-1 chapter).

The interactions between these material impacts, risks and opportunities, Banque Palatine's business model and strategy, embodied by Palatine 2030, as well as how positive or negative material impacts affect the population (customers, regional players or employees) or the environment are presented inside each topical ESRS.

As there are no established practices for financial institutions, the financial impacts relating to the following are not disclosed for the 2024 financial year:

- material risks and opportunities of the company on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows,

- material risks and opportunities for which there is a risk of a significant adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities included in the financial statements during the next annual period. In terms of climate risk, Banque Palatine benefits from the analysis of the resilience of Groupe BPCE's business model across its three activities (financing, insurance, asset management) through climate stress tests as part of its self-assessment processes for capital adequacy (ICAAP) and liquidity (ILAAP) in light of the risks to which it may be exposed. This analysis is presented in chapter E1 - Climate change (section 2.2.3.2.1).

 

1.4.3IRO-2 - Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered
by the undertaking’s sustainability statements

Banque Palatine has not implemented a process for identifying the materiality of information.

 

Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability report.

ESRS 2 GOV-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Board's gender diversity section 21, point (d)

Indicator No. 13, Table 1, Annex I

 

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816 (5)

 

1.3.1.1

Percentage of board members who are independent section 21, point (e)

 

 

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

1.3.1.1

ESRS 2 GOV-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Statement on due diligence section 30

Indicator No. 10, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

1.3.5

 

ESRS 2 SBM-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities section 40, point (d) (i)

Indicator No. 4, Table 1, Annex I

Article 449 bis of regulation (EU) 575/2013; Commission Implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453 (6), Table 1: Qualitative information on environmental risk and Table 2: Qualitative information on social risk

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

Not applicable

Involvement in activities related to chemical production section 40, point (d) (ii)

Indicator No. 9, Table 2, Annex I

 

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

Not applicable

Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons section 40, point (d) (iii)

Indicator No. 14, Table 1, Annex I

 

Article 12 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (7), Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

Not applicable

Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco section 40, point (d) (iv)

 

 

Delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818, article 12 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816, Annex II.

 

Not applicable

ESRS E1-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050 section 14

 

 

 

Article 2 (1) of regulation (EU) 2021/1119

2.2.3.1

Corporates excluded from Paris-aligned Benchmarks section 16, point (g)

 

Article 449 bis regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 1: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, issues and residual maturity

Article 12 (1) (d) to (g) and article 12 (2) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Not applicable

 

ESRS E1-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

GHG emission reduction targets section 34

Indicator No. 4, Table 2, Annex I

Article 449 bis regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission Implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 3: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: alignment indicators

Article 6 of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

2.2.4.1

 

ESRS E1-5

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors) section 38

Indicator No. 5, Table 1, and Indicator No. 5, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not relevant

Energy consumption and mix section 37

Indicator No. 5, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

Not relevant

Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors sections 40 to 43

Indicator No. 6, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

Not relevant

 

ESRS E1-6

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Gross Scopes 1, 2 or 3 emissions and Total GHG emissions section 44

Indicators No. 1 and No. 2, Table 1, Annex I

Article 449 bis of regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 1: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Credit quality of exposures by sector, issues and residual maturity

Article 5 (1), article 6 and article 8 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

2.2.4.2

Gross GHG emissions intensity sections 53 to 55

Indicator No. 3, Table 1, Annex I

Article 449 bis of regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453, Template 3: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: alignment indicators

Article 8 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Not applicable

 

ESRS E1-7

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

GHG removals and carbon credits section 56

 

 

 

Article 2 (1) of regulation (EU) 2021/1119

Not relevant

ESRS E1-9

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks section 66

 

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818, Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

Phase-in

Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk section 66, point (a) Location of significant assets at material physical risk section 66, point (c)

 

Article 449 bis of regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453, paragraphs 46 and 47, Template 5: Banking portfolio - Climate-related physical risks: exposures subject to a physical risk.

 

 

Phase-in

Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy-efficiency classes section 67, point (c)

 

Article 449 bis of regulation (EU) 575/2013, Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2022/2453, paragraph 34, Template 2: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Loans secured by real estate assets - Energy efficiency of collateral

 

 

Phase-in

Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities section 69

 

 

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Phase-in

ESRS E2-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Regulation (E-PRTR) emitted to air, water and soil, section 28

Indicator No. 8, Table 1, Annex I; Indicator No. 2, Table 2, Annex I; Indicator No. 1, Table 2, Annex I; Indicator No. 3, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

 

ESRS E3-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Water and marine resources section 9

Indicator No. 7, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

ESRS E3-1 Dedicated policy section 13

Indicator No. 8, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

 

ESRS E3-1 Sustainable oceans and seas section 14

Indicator No. 12, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

 

ESRS E3-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Total percentage of water recycled and reused section 28, point (c)

Indicator No. 6.2, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

Total water consumption in m3 per net revenue on own operations section 29

Indicator No. 6.1, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

ESRS 2 - SBM 3 - E4

Disclosure requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Section 16, point (a) i

Indicator No. 7, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

Section 16, point (b)

Indicator No. 10, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

Section 16, point (c)

Indicator No. 14, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

 

ESRS E4-2

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Sustainable land/agricultural practices or policies section 24, point (b)

Indicator No. 11, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

Sustainable ocean/sea practices or policies section 24, point (c)

Indicator No. 12, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

Policies to address deforestation section 24, point (d)

Indicator No. 15, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

 

ESRS E5-5

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Non-recycled waste section 37, point (d)

Indicator No. 13, Table 2, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

Hazardous waste and radioactive waste section 39

Indicator No. 9, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

Not material

ESRS 2 - SBM3 - S1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Risk of incidents of forced labour section 14, point (f)

Indicator No. 13, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.3.4.1

Risk of incidents of child labour section 14, point (g)

Indicator No. 12, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.3.4.1

 

ESRS S1-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Human rights policy commitments section 20

Indicator No. 9, Table 3, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.3.1.1.

Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organization Conventions 1 to 8 section 21

 

 

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

3.1.3.1.1

3.1.3.1.2

3.1.3.4.1

Processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings section 22

Indicator No. 11, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.3.1.1

3.1.3.4.1

Workplace accident prevention policy or management system section 23

Indicator No. 1, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.3.1.2

 

ESRS S1-3

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Grievance/complaints handling mechanisms section 32, point (c)

Indicator No. 5, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.3.3.1

ESRS S1-14

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents section 88, points (b) and (c)

Indicator No. 2, Table 3, Annex I

 

Annex II of Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

3.1.5.10

Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness section 88, point (e)

Indicator No. 3, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.5.10

 

ESRS S1-16

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Unadjusted gender pay gap section 97, point (a)

Indicator No. 12, Table 1, Annex I

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

3.1.5.12

Excessive CEO pay ratio section 97, point (b)

Indicator No. 8, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.1.5.12

 

ESRS S1-17

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Incidents of discrimination section 103, point (a)

Indicator No. 7, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

Not relevant

Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines section 104, point (a)

Indicator No. 10, Table 1, and Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816, article 12 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Not relevant

 

ESRS 2 - SBM3 - S2

Disclosure Requirement and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain section 11, point (b)

Indicators No. 12 and No. 13, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.2.2

ESRS S2-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Human rights policy commitments section 17

Indicator No. 9, Table 3, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

3.2.3.1

Policies related to value chain workers section 18

Indicators No. 11 and No. 4, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.2.3.1

Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines section 19

Indicator No. 10, Table 1, Annex I

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816, article 12 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Not relevant

Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organization Conventions 1 to 8, section 19

 

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

3.2.3.4

 

ESRS S2-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain section 36

Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

Not relevant

 

ESRS S3-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Human rights policy commitments section 16

Indicator No. 9, Table 3, Annex I, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

3.3.2

Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles or OECD guidelines section 17

Indicator No. 10, Table 1, Annex I

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816, article 12 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Not relevant

ESRS S3-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Human rights issues and incidents section 36

Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.3.3.3

 

ESRS S4-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Policies related to consumers and end-users section 16

Indicator No. 9, Table 3, and Indicator No. 11, Table 1, Annex I

 

 

 

3.4.3.1

Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines section 17

Indicator No. 10, Table 1, Annex I

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816, article 12 (1) of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1818

 

Not relevant

 

ESRS S4-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Human rights issues and incidents section 35

Indicator No. 14, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

3.4.3.3

 

ESRS G1-1

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

United Nations Convention against Corruption section 10, point (b)

Indicator No. 15, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

4.1.1.5.1

Protection of whistle-blowers section 10, point (d)

Indicator No. 6, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

4.1.1.3.3

ESRS G1-4

Disclosure Requirement 
and related data point

SFDR 
reference (1)

Pillar III 
reference (2)

Benchmark indices 
regulation reference (3)

EU 
European law 
on climate (4)

Report section

Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws section 24, point (a)

Indicator No. 17, Table 3, Annex I

 

Annex II of delegated regulation (EU) 2020/1816

 

4.1.2.1

Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery section 24, point (b)

Indicator No. 16, Table 3, Annex I

 

 

 

4.1.2.1

  • (1)Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability reporting in the financial services sector (OJ L 317, 09.12.2019, p. 1).
  • (2)Regulation (EU) 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (EU) 648/2012 (Capital Requirements Regulation - CRR) (OJ L 176, 27.06.2013, p. 1).
  • (3)Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the indices used as benchmarks for financial instruments and contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds and amending Directives 2008/48/EC and 2014/17/EU and regulation (EU) 596/2014 (OJ L 171, 29.06.2016, p. 1).
  • (4)Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework required to achieve climate neutrality and amending regulations (EC) No. 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (“European law on the climate ”) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2001, p.1).

 

Cross-reference table of published information

ESRS

Disclosure requirement

References in the sustainability statement

Page

ESRS 2

BP-1 — General basis for the preparation of sustainability statements

1.1.1 BP 1 — General basis for the preparation of sustainability statements

24

 

BP 2 — Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances

1.1.2 BP 2 — Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances

24

 

GOV-1 — The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

1.3.1 GOV-1 — The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

38

 

GOV 2 — Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies

1.3.2 GOV 2 — Information provided to the company’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies and sustainability issues addressed by them

38

 

GOV-3 — Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes

1.3.3 GOV-3 — Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes

38

 

GOV 4 — Statement on due diligence

1.3.5 GOV 4 — Statement on due diligence

43

 

GOV 5 — Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting

1.3.4 GOV 5 — Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting

39

 

SBM-1 — Strategy, business model and value chain

1.2.1 SBM 1 — Strategy, business model and value chain

27

 

SBM 2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

1.2.2 SBM 2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

35

 

SBM 3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model

1.4.2 SBM 3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model

35

 

IRO-1 — Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities

1.4.1.1 IRO 1 — Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities

43

 

IRO-2 — Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statements

1.4.3 IRO-2 — Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statements

56

ESRS E1

ESRS 2 GOV-3 — Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes

1.3.3 GOV-3 — Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes

38

 

E1-1 — Transition plan for climate change mitigation

2.2.3.1 (E1-1) Transition plan for climate change mitigation

83

 

ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

2.2.3.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model

85

 

ESRS 2 IRO-1 —Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities

2.2.2.1 (ESRS 2 - IRO-1) Description of processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities

79

 

E1-2 — Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation

2.2.3.3 (E1-2) Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation

86

 

E1-3 — Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies

2.2.3.4 (E1-3) Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies

87

 

E1-4 — Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation

2.2.4.1 (E1-4) Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation

92

 

E1-6 — Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions

2.2.4.2 (E1-6) Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions

94

ESRS S1

ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

3.1.1 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

98

 

ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

3.1.2 Disclosure requirement related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

98

 

S1-1 — Policies related to own workforce

3.1.3.1 (S1-1) Policies related to own workforce

99

 

S1-2 — Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers' representatives about impacts

3.1.3.2 (S1-2) Processes for engaging with own workforce and workers' representatives about impacts

108

 

S1-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns

3.1.3.3 (S1-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workforce to raise concerns

111

 

S1-4 — Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and the effectiveness of those actions

3.1.3.4 (S1-4) Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and the effectiveness of those actions

112

 

S1-5 — Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

3.1.4.1 (S1-5) Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

116

 

S1-6 — Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees

3.1.5.2 (S1-6) Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees

118

 

S1-7 - Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce

3.1.5.3 (S1-7) Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce

121

 

S1-8 — Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue 

3.1.5.4 (S1-8) Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue 

121

 

S1-9 — Diversity metrics

3.1.5.5 (S1-9) Diversity metrics

121

 

S1-10 — Adequate wages

3.1.5.6 (S1-10) Adequate wages

122

 

S1-11 — Social protection

3.1.5.7 (S1-11) Social protection

122

 

S1-12 — People with disabilities

3.1.5.8 (S1-12) People with disabilities

122

 

S1-13 — Training and skills development metrics

3.1.5.9 (S1-13) Training and skills development metrics

123

 

S1-14 — Health and safety metrics

3.1.5.10 (S1-14) Health and safety metrics

124

 

S1-15 — Work-life balance metrics

3.1.5.11 (S1-15) Work-life balance metrics

124

 

S1-16 — Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)

3.1.5.12 (S1-16) Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration)

125

 

S1-17 — Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts

3.1.5.13 (S1-17) Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts

126

ESRS S2

ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

3.2.1 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

126

 

ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

3.2.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

126

 

S2-1 — Policies related to value chain workers

3.2.3.1 (S2-1) Policies related to value chain workers

127

 

S2-2 — Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts

3.2.3.2 (S2-2) Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts

129

 

S2-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns

3.2.3.3 (S2-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns

130

 

S2-4 — Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions

3.2.3.4 (S2-4) Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions

131

 

S2-5 — Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

3.2.4.1 (S2-5) Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

131

ESRS S3

ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

3.3.1 SBM 2 - Interests and views of stakeholders

132

 

ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

3.3.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

132

 

S3-1 — Policies related to affected communities

3.3.3.1 (S3-1) Policies related to affected communities

132

 

S3-2 — Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts

3.3.3.2 (S3-2) Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts

132

 

S3-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns

3.3.3.3 (S3-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns

132

 

S3-4 — Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions

3.3.3.4 (S3-4) Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions

133

 

S3-5 - Targets related to the management of material negative impacts, the development of positive impacts, and the management of material risks and opportunities

3.3.4 (S3-5) Metrics and targets

134

ESRS S4

ESRS 2 SBM-2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

3.4.1 SBM 2 — Interests and views of stakeholders

135

 

ESRS 2 SBM-3 — Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

3.4.2 (ESRS 2 SBM-3) Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with the strategy and business model

135

 

S4-1 —Policies related to consumers and end-users

3.4.3.1 (S4-1) Policies related to consumers and end-users

136

 

S4-2 — Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts

3.4.3.2 (S4-2) Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts

140

 

S4-3 — Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns

3.4.3.3 (S4-3) Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns

142

 

S4-4 — Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions

3.4.3.4 (S4-4) Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions

144

 

S4-5 — Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

3.4.4.1 (S4-5) Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities

144

ESRS G1

ESRS 2 GOV-1 — The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

4.1.1.1 (ESRS 2 - GOV-1) The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies

148

 

ESRS 2 IRO-1 — Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities

4.1.1.2 (IRO-1) Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities

148

 

G1-1 — Corporate culture and business conduct policies

4.1.1.3 (G1-1) Corporate culture and business conduct policies

148

 

G1-2 — Management of relationships with suppliers

4.1.1.4 (G1-2) Management of relationships with suppliers

152

 

G1-3 — Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery

4.1.1.5 (G1-3) Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery

153

 

G1-4 — Incidents of corruption or bribery

4.1.2.1 (G1-4) Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery

156

3Board of Directors’ corporate governance report

 

 

 

 

 

To the shareholders,

In addition to the Board of Directors’ management report and pursuant to the provisions of articles L. 225-37 and L. 225-37-4 of the French Commercial Code, the Board of Directors reports on the following in this report:

  • the composition of the board, the conditions for the preparation and organisation of the work of the Board of Directors, the rules and principles governing the determination of remuneration and benefits of any kind granted to corporate officers;
  • draft resolutions regarding remuneration which will be submitted to you at the time of the General Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024.

The items of the report required under article 266 of the order of 3 November 2014, modified by the order of 28 July 2021 and the list of the terms of office held by the corporate officers during the 2024 financial year, are appended.

It was previously presented to the Appointments Committee and Remunerations Committee meeting of 9 April 2025, before being approved by the Board of Directors on 10 April 2025.

In their report prepared pursuant to article L. 22-10-71 of the French Commercial Code, the Statutory Auditors attest the other information required by article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code (presented in the corporate governance report), and if applicable, present their observations.

 

Board of Directors

3.1Corporate governance

The AFEP-MEDEF Corporate Governance Code for listed companies, updated in December 2022 and incorporating the recommendations on remuneration for senior executives, is the code used by Banque Palatine to prepare this report.

Some provisions are not relevant to the context of Banque Palatine, since its share capital is held in its entirety by BPCE. Consequently, the following provisions have not been taken into account to date:

  • the proportion of independent members of the Board of Directors and its committees created by the Board of Directors:
  • Banque Palatine is a wholly owned subsidiary of BPCE. In this context and in view of Banque Palatine’s position within Groupe BPCE, a direct shareholder representation (the Chairman and a representative) as well as of Groupe BPCE via the senior executives of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne banks was favoured in order to maintain a balance of powers and a balanced representation of the Banque Populaire and Caisse d’Epargne networks. This diversity of profiles on the Board of Directors promotes the quality of work and discussions within the board, an objective pursued by the recommendation of the AFEP-MEDEF Code;
  • ownership of a significant number of Banque Palatine shares by the board members.

The principle of a gender balance on the Board of Directors and committees has been upheld.

Two board members were elected by employees - one representing managerial-level employees and the other representing technical and supervisory-grade staff.

On 31 December 2024, the Board of Directors was composed of four women and four men, including two board members representing employees. Thus, the percentage of female board members on the Board of Directors was 50%.

Lastly, pursuant to article 11 of the articles of association, the board members are not obliged to be company shareholders.

 

Table summarising compliance with the main recommendation of the AFEP-MEDEF Code

 

 

 

  • 1/Missions of the Board of Directors

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 2/Board of Directors: collegiate body

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 3/Diversity of methods of organisation of governance: separation of the duties of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 4/Board of Directors and communication with shareholders and the market

 

Recommendations implemented / Not relevant for financial rating agencies

  • 5/The Board of Directors and social and environmental responsibility

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 6/Board of Directors and General Shareholders' Meeting

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 7/Composition of the Board of Directors: guidelines

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 8/Gender diversity policy within the governing bodies

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 9/Representation of employee shareholders and employees

 

Recommendation implemented / Not relevant for Banque Palatine as regards employee shareholders

  • 10/ Independent board members

 

Recommendation not implemented due to the necessary balanced representation of Groupe BPCE institutions and the bank’s status as a wholly-owned subsidiary

  • 11/ Board appraisal

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 12/ Board and committee meetings

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 13/ Access to board member information

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 14/ Board member training

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 15/ Board members’ terms of office

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 16/ Board committees: general principles

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 17/ Audit Committee

 

Recommendations partially implemented (not followed for the proportion of independent board members due to the necessary balanced representation of Groupe BPCE institutions and the bank’s status as a wholly-owned subsidiary)

  • 18/ Committee responsible for appointments

 

Recommendations partially implemented (not followed for the proportion of independent board members due to the necessary balanced representation of Groupe BPCE institutions and the bank’s status as a wholly-owned subsidiary)

  • 19/ Committee responsible for remuneration

 

Recommendations partially implemented (not followed for the proportion of independent board members due to the necessary balanced representation of Groupe BPCE institutions and the bank’s status as a wholly-owned subsidiary)

  • 20/ Number of terms for executive directors and board members

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 21/ Board members’ ethics

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 22/ Remuneration of board members

 

Recommendations implemented

 

  • 23/ Termination of employment contract for corporate office

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 24/ The obligations for executive directors to hold shares

 

Recommendations not implemented / Not relevant for Banque Palatine

  • 25/ Entering into a non-competition agreement with an executive director

 

Recommendations not implemented / Not relevant for Banque Palatine

  • 26/ Remuneration of executive directors

 

Recommendations implemented

  • 27/ Information on the remuneration of corporate officers and policies for granting stock options and performance shares

 

Recommendations implemented / Not relevant for Banque Palatine concerning stock option and performance share allocation policies

  • 28/ Implementation of recommendations

 

Recommendations implemented

 

2. 2024 financial statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Annual separate financial statements at 31 December 2024

 

 

1.1 Income statement

in millions of euros

Notes

2024
 financial year

2023
 financial year

Interest and similar income

3.1

1,023.2

888.8

Interest and similar expenses

3.1

(763.4)

(588.8)

Income on finance and operating leases

3.2

0.0

0.0

Expenses on finance and operating leases

3.2

0.0

0.0

Income from variable-income securities

3.3

5.7

5.4

Commission income

3.4

91.9

89.2

Commission expenses

3.4

(7.3)

(7.5)

Net gains or losses on trading book transactions

3.5

1.4

0.6

Net gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and similar items

3.6

2.4

21.8

Other banking income

3.7

0.5

1.1

Other banking expenses

3.7

(3.0)

(4.8)

Net banking income

 

351.5

405.8

General operating expenses

3.8

(202.6)

(208.1)

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

 

(0.1)

(4.9)

Gross operating income

 

148.8

192.8

Cost of risk

3.9

(68.3)

(26.2)

Net operating income

 

80.5

166.6

Profits and losses on non-current assets

3.10

5.4

6.6

Income before tax

 

85.9

173.2

Non-recurring items

3.11

0.0

0.0

Income tax

3.12

(27.5)

(48.9)

Charges to/reversals from the fund for general banking risks and regulated provisions

 

0.0

0.0

NET INCOME

 

58.4

124.2

2 Notes to the annual separate financial statements

Note 1 General framework
1.1 Groupe BPCE

Groupe BPCE(1), of which Banque Palatine is a part, includes the Banque Populaire network, the Caisse d’Epargne network, the BPCE central body and its subsidiaries.

Two banking networks: the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne

Groupe BPCE is a cooperative group whose members own two retail banking networks: the 14 Banque Populaire banks and the 15 Caisse d’Epargne banks. Each of the two networks owns an equal share in BPCE, the Group’s central institution.

The Banque Populaire network consists of the Banques Populaires and the mutual guarantee companies which grant them the exclusive benefit of their guarantees.

The Caisse d’Epargne network consists of the Caisse d’Epargne banks and the local savings companies (LSCs).

The Banques Populaires are wholly-owned by their cooperative shareholders.

The capital of the Caisses d’Epargne is wholly-owned by the LSCs. Local savings companies are cooperative structures with open-ended share capital owned by cooperative shareholders. The LSCs are tasked with coordinating the cooperative shareholder base, in line with the general objectives defined by the individual Caisse d’Epargne with which they are affiliated, and cannot perform banking transactions.

BPCE

A central body as defined by the French banking act, and a credit institution licensed to operate as a bank, BPCE was created pursuant to act no. 2009-715 of 18 June 2009. BPCE was incorporated as a French société anonyme with a Management Board and a Supervisory Board. Its share capital is owned jointly and equally by the 14 Banque Populaire and 15 Caisse d’Epargne banks.

BPCE’s corporate mission embodies the continuity of the cooperative principles underlying the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne.

Specifically, BPCE represents the interests of its various affiliates in dealings with the supervisory authorities, defines the range of products and services offered by them, organises depositor protection, approves key appointments of company directors and oversees the smooth operation of the Group’s institutions.

As a holding company, BPCE acts as the ultimate controlling party of the Group and holds the joint ventures between the two networks in retail banking and insurance, corporate banking and financial services, and their production units. It defines the Group’s corporate strategy and growth and expansion policies.

The network and BPCE’s main subsidiaries are organised around two main business lines:

  • Retail banking and insurance, which includes the Banque Populaire network, the Caisse d’Epargne network, the Financial Solutions & Expertise division (including factoring, consumer loans, leasing, sureties & financial guarantees, and the “Retail securities” business), the Digital & Payments (integrating the payments subsidiaries and the Oney group) and Insurance divisions, and Other networks;
  • Global Financial Services combining Asset & Wealth Management (Natixis Investment Managers and Natixis Wealth Management) and Global Customers Bank (Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking).

In respect of the Group’s financial functions, BPCE is responsible, in particular, for the centralised management of surplus funds, for the execution of any financial transactions required to develop and fund the Group, and for choosing the most appropriate counterparty for these transactions in the broader interests of the Group. BPCE also provides banking services to the other Group entities.

Banque Palatine

Banque Palatine is a société anonyme (French limited liability corporation) with a Board of Directors, wholly owned by the BPCE central body. Its registered office has been located at 86, rue de Courcelles - 75008 Paris (France) since 1 January 2022.

Banque Palatine’s main subsidiaries and investments are active in three segments:

  • financial services and asset management activities;
  • property services (i.e. transactions, sales, development and promotion, consulting & expertise/asset management);
  • insurance activities.
1.2Guarantee mechanism

In accordance with articles L. 511-31, L. 512-107-5 and L. 512-107-6 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, the guarantee and solidarity mechanism aims to safeguard the liquidity and capital adequacy of the Group and BPCE’s affiliates, and to organise financial support between them.

BPCE is responsible for taking all necessary measures to ensure the solvency of the Group and each of the networks and to organise financial solidarity within the Group. This financial solidarity is based on legislative provisions establishing a legal principle of solidarity obliging the central institution to restore the liquidity or solvency of affiliates in difficulty and/or all affiliates of the Group. By virtue of the unlimited nature of the principle of solidarity, BPCE is entitled at any time to ask any one or several or all of the affiliates to contribute to the financial efforts that may be necessary to restore the situation, and may, if necessary, mobilise all the cash and equity of the affiliates in the event of difficulty for one or more of them.

In the event of difficulties, BPCE will have to do everything necessary to restore the financial position and may in particular make unlimited use of the resources of any, several or all affiliates, or implement the appropriate mechanisms of internal solidarity of the Group and by calling on the guarantee fund common to the two networks of which it determines the rules of operation, the triggering conditions, in addition to the funds of the two networks as well as the contributions of the affiliated institutions for its endowment and reconstitution.

BPCE manages the Banque Populaire Network Fund, the Caisse d’Epargne Network Fund and the Mutual Guarantee Fund.

The Banque Populaire Network Fund was formed by a deposit made by the Banques Populaires of €450 million that was booked by BPCE in the form of a 10-year term account which is indefinitely renewable.

The deposit made to the Caisse d’Epargne Network Fund by the Caisses d’Epargne of €450 million was booked by BPCE in the form of a 10-year term account which is indefinitely renewable.

The Mutual Guarantee Fund was formed by deposits made by the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne. These deposits were booked by BPCE in the form of 10-year term accounts which are indefinitely renewable. The amount of the deposits by network was €197 million at 31 December 2024.

The total amount of deposits made to BPCE in respect of the Banque Populaire Network Fund, the Caisse d’Epargne Network Fund and the Mutual Guarantee Fund may not be less than 0.15% and may not exceed 0.3% of the Group’s total risk-weighted assets.

The booking of deposits in the institutions’ individual financial statements under the guarantee and solidarity system results in the recording of an item of an equivalent amount under a dedicated equity heading.

Mutual guarantee companies granting the exclusivity of their guarantees to a Banque Populaire benefit from a liquidity and capital adequacy guarantee in their capacity as affiliates of the central institution.

The liquidity and capital adequacy of the local savings companies are secured, firstly, at the level of each individual local savings company by the Caisse d’Epargne of which the local savings company in question is a shareholder.

The Management Board of BPCE holds all the requisite powers to mobilise the resources of the various contributors without delay and in accordance with the agreed order, on the basis of prior authorisations given to BPCE by the contributors.

1.3 Significant events

Significant events are presented in chapter 1.1 - Management report of the Board of Directors - Highlights of the year for Banque Palatine”.

1.4 Post-balance sheet events

Since 31 December 2024 and until 4 February 2025, the reporting date of financial statements approved by the Board of Directors, no event occurred likely to have a notable influence on the financial position or the income of Banque Palatine.

3 IFRS consolidated financial statements
of the Palatine Group at 31 December 2024

3.1 Consolidated income statement

in millions of euros

Notes

2024
 financial year

2023
 financial year

Interest and similar income

4.1

680.5

590.0

Interest and similar expenses

4.1

(417.7)

(310.9)

Commission income

4.2

111.8

112.3

Commission expenses

4.2

(10.8)

(11.5)

Net gains or losses on financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss

4.3

17.4

15.6

Net gains or losses on financial instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income

4.4

0.5

(5.5)

Net gains or losses arising from derecognition of financial assets at amortised cost

4.5

0.0

0.0

Income from other activities

4.6

0.2

0.7

Expenses from other activities

4.6

(4.6)

(6.6)

Net banking income

 

377.3

384.2

General operating expenses

4.7

(203.2)

(212.3)

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

4.7

(10.8)

(11.3)

Gross operating income

 

163.3

160.7

Cost of credit risk

7.1.1

(62.3)

(33.1)

Net operating income

 

101.0

127.6

Share in net income of associates and joint ventures

11.4.2

0.2

0.3

Gains or losses on other assets

4.8

3.6

7.2

Value adjustments on goodwill

3.5.2

0.0

0.0

Income before tax

 

104.8

135.2

Income tax

10.1

(24.6)

(34.4)

Net income

 

80.2

100.7

Non-controlling interests

 

0.0

0.0

Net income, Group's share

 

80.2

100.7

4 Notes to the Palatine Group
consolidated financial statements

Note 1General framework
1.1 Groupe BPCE and Banque Palatine

Groupe BPCE comprises the Banque Populaire network, the Caisse d’Epargne network, the BPCE central institution and their subsidiaries.

Two banking networks: the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne

Groupe BPCE is a cooperative group whose shareholders own the two retail banking networks: the 14 Banques Populaires and the 15 Caisses d’Epargne. Each of the two networks owns an equal share in BPCE, the Group’s central institution.

The Banque Populaire network consists of the Banques Populaires and the mutual guarantee companies which grant them the exclusive benefit of their guarantees.

The Caisse d’Epargne network consists of the Caisses d’Epargne and the local savings companies (LSCs).

The Banques Populaires are wholly-owned by their cooperative shareholders.

The capital of the Caisses d’Epargne is wholly-owned by the LSCs. Local savings companies are cooperative structures with open-ended share capital owned by cooperative shareholders. The LSCs are tasked with coordinating the cooperative shareholder base, in line with the general objectives defined by the individual Caisse d’Epargne with which they are affiliated, and cannot perform banking transactions.

BPCE

BPCE, a central body as defined by the French banking law and a credit institution licensed to operate as a bank, was created pursuant to act no. 2009-715 of 18 June 2009. BPCE was incorporated as a French société anonyme with a Management Board and a Supervisory Board. Its share capital is owned jointly and equally by the 14 Banque Populaire and 15 Caisse d’Epargne banks.

BPCE’s corporate mission embodies the continuity of the cooperative principles underlying the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne.

Specifically, BPCE represents the interests of its various affiliates in dealings with the supervisory authorities, defines the range of products and services offered by them, organises depositor protection, approves key appointments of company directors and oversees the smooth operation of the Group’s institutions.

As a holding company, BPCE acts as the ultimate controlling party of the Group and holds the joint ventures between the two networks in retail banking and insurance, corporate banking and financial services, and their production units. It defines the Group’s corporate strategy and growth and expansion policies.

The network and BPCE’s main subsidiaries are organised around two main business lines:

  • Retail Banking and Insurance, which includes the Banque Populaire network, the Caisse d’Epargne network, the Financial Solutions & Expertise division (including factoring, consumer loans, leasing, financial guarantees, and the “Retail securities” business), the Digital and Payments (integrating the payments subsidiaries and the Oney group) and insurance divisions, and Other networks;
  • Global Financial Services combining Asset & Wealth Management (Natixis Investment Managers and Natixis Wealth Management) and Global Customers Bank (Natixis Corporate & Investment Banking).

In respect of the Group’s financial functions, BPCE is responsible, in particular, for the centralised management of surplus funds, for the execution of any financial transactions required to develop and fund the Group, and for choosing the most appropriate counterparty for these transactions in the broader interests of the Group. BPCE also provides banking services to the other Group entities.

Banque Palatine

 is a , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the central body BPCE. Its registered office is located at  ().

Its main subsidiaries and affiliates are active in two segments:

  • financial services and asset management activities;
  • insurance activities.
1.2 Guarantee mechanism

In accordance with articles L. 511-31, L. 512-107-5 and L. 512-107-6 of the French Monetary and Financial Code, the guarantee and solidarity mechanism aims to safeguard the liquidity and capital adequacy of the Group and BPCE’s affiliates, and to organise financial support between them.

BPCE is responsible for taking all necessary measures to ensure the solvency of the Group and each of the networks and to organise financial solidarity within the Group. This financial solidarity is based on legislative provisions establishing a legal principle of solidarity obliging the central institution to restore the liquidity or solvency of affiliates in difficulty and/or all affiliates of the Group. By virtue of the unlimited nature of the principle of solidarity, BPCE is entitled at any time to ask any one or several or all of the affiliates to contribute to the financial efforts that may be necessary to restore the situation, and may, if necessary, mobilise all the cash and equity of the affiliates in the event of difficulty for one or more of them.

In the event of difficulties, BPCE will have to do everything necessary to restore the financial position and may in particular make unlimited use of the resources of any, several or all affiliates, or implement the appropriate mechanisms of internal solidarity of the Group and by calling on the guarantee fund common to the two networks of which it determines the rules of operation, the triggering conditions, in addition to the funds of the two networks as well as the contributions of the affiliated institutions for its endowment and reconstitution.

BPCE manages the Banque Populaire Network Fund, the Caisse d’Epargne Network Fund and the Mutual Guarantee Fund.

The Banque Populaire Network Fund was formed by a deposit made by the Banques Populaires of €450 million that was booked by BPCE in the form of a 10-year term account which is indefinitely renewable.

The deposit made to the Caisse d’Epargne Network Fund by the Caisses d’Epargne of €450 million was booked by BPCE in the form of a 10-year term account which is indefinitely renewable.

The Mutual Guarantee Fund was formed by deposits made by the Banques Populaires and the Caisses d’Epargne. These deposits were booked by BPCE in the form of 10-year term accounts which are indefinitely renewable. The amount of the deposits by network was €197 million at 31 December 2024.

The total amount of deposits made to BPCE in respect of the Banque Populaire Network Fund, the Caisse d’Epargne Network Fund and the Mutual Guarantee Fund may not be less than 0.15% and may not exceed 0.3% of the Group’s total risk-weighted assets.

The booking of deposits in the institutions’ individual financial statements under the guarantee and solidarity system results in the recording of an item of an equivalent amount under a dedicated equity heading.

Mutual guarantee companies granting the exclusivity of their guarantees to a Banque Populaire benefit from a liquidity and capital adequacy guarantee in their capacity as affiliates of the central institution.

The liquidity and capital adequacy of the local savings companies are secured, firstly, at the level of each individual local savings company by the Caisse d’Epargne of which the local savings company in question is a shareholder.

The Management Board of BPCE holds all the requisite powers to mobilise the resources of the various contributors without delay and in accordance with the agreed order, on the basis of prior authorisations given to BPCE by the contributors.

 

1.3 Significant events

Significant events are presented in chapter 1.1 Management report of the Board of Directors - Highlights of the year for Banque Palatine.

1.4 Post-balance sheet events

Since 31 December 2024 and until 4 February 2025, the reporting date of financial statements approved by the Board of Directors, no event occurred likely to have a notable influence on the financial position or the income of Banque Palatine.

3. Statutory Auditors’ reports

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Statutory Auditors’ report on the annual financial statements

 

Year ended 31 December 2024

 

To the General Meeting

 

Opinion

Pursuant to the mission entrusted to us by your General Meeting, we conducted an audit of the annual financial statements of Banque Palatine SA for the year ended 31 December 2024, as appended to this report.

In our opinion, the annual financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the financial position of the company, and of the results of its operations for the year ended, in accordance with French accounting principles.

The above opinion is consistent with the content of our report to the Audit Committee.

 

2 Statutory Auditors’ special report on regulated agreements

 

General Meeting held to approve the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2024

 

To the General Meeting of Banque Palatine

 

In our capacity as Statutory Auditors of your company, we hereby present our report on the regulated agreements.

It is our responsibility to inform you, on the basis of the information provided to us, of the characteristics, the essential terms and the justifications of the agreements about which we have been informed or that we have discovered during our audit, without commenting on their usefulness or merit or ascertaining the existence of other such agreements. It is your responsibility, under the terms of article R. 225-31 of the French Commercial Code, to assess the benefits resulting from these agreements prior to their approval.

In addition, we are required to inform you, in accordance with article R. 225-31 of the French Commercial Code, of the execution, during the past year, of the agreements already approved by the General Meeting.

We performed the procedures we considered necessary to comply with the Professional Code of the Compagnie nationale des commissaires aux comptes (France’s National Association of Statutory Auditors) relating to this assignment.

Our work consisted of verifying that the information provided to us is consistent with the underlying documents from which it was extracted.

 

Agreements subject to the General Meeting's approval

Pursuant to article L. 225-40 of the French Commercial Code, we have been advised of the following agreement entered into during the past year, which was authorised by your Board of Directors.

 

3 Statutory Auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements

 

Year ended 31 December 2024

 

To the General Meeting

 

Opinion

Pursuant to the mission entrusted to us by your General Meeting, we conducted an audit of the consolidated financial statements of BANQUE PALATINE for the year ended on 31 December 2024, as appended to this report.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the operating results for the year ended and of the financial position, assets and liabilities of the companies and entities included in the consolidated group in accordance with IFRS standards as adopted in the European Union.

The above opinion is consistent with the content of our report to the Audit Committee.

 

4. 2024 Risk management

 

 

 

 

 

Key figures at 31 December 2024

as a %

31/12/2024

31/12/2023

Tier 1 ratio

10.19%

10.05%

CET1 ratio

9.25%

9.12%

Total capital adequacy ratio

12.62%

12.27%

 

■ Additional indicators

in millions of euros

31/12/2024

31/12/2023

Total assets

19,187.3

18,766.4

Customer loans

11,982.4

11,797.3

 

1 Risk factors for Groupe BPCE including Banque Palatine

The banking and financial environment in which Groupe BPCE operates, including Banque Palatine, exposes it to a multitude of risks and requires the implementation of an increasingly demanding and rigorous risk control and management policy.

Some of the risks to which Groupe BPCE, including Banque Palatine, is exposed are set out below. However, this is not a comprehensive list of all of the risks incurred by Groupe BPCE, including Banque Palatine, in the course of conducting its business or given the environment in which it operates. The risks presented below are those identified to date as significant and specific to Groupe BPCE, including Banque Palatine, and liable to have a material adverse impact on its business, financial position and/or results. For each of the risk sub-classes listed below, the risk factor considered to date by Groupe BPCE as the most significant is listed first.

The risks presented below are those identified to date as liable to have an adverse impact on the businesses of BPCE SA.

The risk factors described below are presented as of the date of this document and the situation described may change, even significantly, at any time.

 

1.1Strategic, business and ecosystem risks

The physical and transitional components of climate and environmental risks and their consequences for economic players could adversely affect Groupe BPCE’s activities, results and financial position.

Climate and environmental risks relate to the financial and non-financial impacts of climate change and environmental damage. These risks can be direct (i.e. on the Group’s own operations) as well as indirect (i.e. on the bank’s counterparties). They are factors that exacerbate existing risks, in particular credit risk, operational risk and market risk, and may also carry reputational risks for Groupe BPCE.

Physical climate and environmental risks correspond to the economic costs resulting from extreme weather events (such as heat waves, landslides, floods, late frosts, fires, storms, pollution of water, soil and air, or water-stressed situations) whose intensity and frequency increase due to climate change, as well as to gradual long-term changes in the climate or the environment (such as changes in rainfall patterns, rising sea levels and average temperatures, the loss of biodiversity, or the depletion of natural resources). These risks can affect the activity of economic players directly (damage and unavailability of assets, disruption of distribution and supply capacities, etc.) or indirectly, through their macro-economic environment (decline in productivity, reduced attractiveness of regions, etc.) and deteriorate the financial position and valuation of economic assets.

Transition climate and environmental risks are linked to the consequences of the transition to a more sustainable and low-carbon economy, which may in particular result in regulatory changes, technological shifts, or sociodemographic changes leading to a change in the expectations of stakeholders (customers, employees, civil society, etc.). These changes may call into question all or part of the business model and result in significant investment needs for economic players. They may also lead to a loss in the valuation of economic assets that are not aligned with the transition objectives and have macro-economic consequences at the level of the business segments.

The consequences of climate and environmental risks, both physical and transition risks, on its counterparties are likely to result in financial losses for Groupe BPCE through increased risks related to its financing, investment or insurance activities. Groupe BPCE could also be exposed to financial losses due to the direct exposure of its activities to the consequences of climate and environmental risks, which could lead to an increase in operational, reputational, compliance or legal risks.

Groupe BPCE may be vulnerable to political, macroeconomic and financial environments or to specific circumstances in its countries of operation.

Some Groupe BPCE entities are exposed to country risk, which is the risk that economic, financial, political or social conditions in a country (particularly in countries where the Group conducts business) may affect their financial interests. Groupe BPCE predominantly does business in France (77% of net banking income for the financial year ended 31 December 2024) and North America (13% of net banking income for the financial year ended 31 December 2024), with other European countries and the rest of the world accounting for 3% and 7%, respectively, of net banking income for the financial year ended 31 December 2024. Note 12.6 “Locations by country” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE, contained in the 2024 Universal Registration Document, lists the entities established in each country and gives a breakdown of net banking income and income before tax by country of establishment.

A significant change in the political or macroeconomic environment of such countries or regions may generate additional expenses or reduce profits earned by Groupe BPCE.

The economic outlook remains weakened by the uncertainties and downside risks surrounding it, especially when these are compounded by geopolitical tensions. In particular, two major events marked the year 2024, the effects of which may extend into 2025 and beyond: the surprise dissolution of the French National Assembly on 9 June and the presidential election of Donald Trump in the United States on 5 November. Generally, the extent of the imbalances to be eliminated can also always tip the developed economies into a downward spiral, whether it is the significance of public and private debts on both sides of the Atlantic and in China, the resurgence of an inflationary expectation mechanism or the heterogeneity of geographical and sectoral situations, combined with overlapping global risks, thus fuelling the return of the risk of financial instability. In addition, there is the potential occurrence of natural disasters or health risks. Joint threats mainly concern geopolitical and economic uncertainties: the context of the war waged by Russia against Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East; the still latent risks of tensions between Taiwan and China; the availability of nuclear weapons in Iran; the Sino-US geostrategic confrontation and the development of protectionist trends, particularly in the US; the deepening of economic decline in Europe, Germany and France, in the face of the strategies of the race for industrial hegemon implemented by China and the United States; the emergence of eurosceptic and protectionist governments in several major European economies; even the behaviour of European and French consumers, whose savings rate remains well above its pre-health crisis level.

France entered a situation of political instability after the dissolution of the National Assembly. The business climate, which declined in the summer just after the dissolution, remained below its long-term average. Its fiscal credibility, already tarnished by an unanticipated public deficit of 5.5% of GDP in 2023 and by the downgrade of its sovereign rating on 31 May by Standard & Poor’s, the most powerful American agency (rating downgraded to AA-, from AA since 2013), then Moody’s rating on 4 December (Aa3 from Aa2), became the main victim of ambitious election campaign promises, with no real basis in terms of financing. With the censorship of the government of Prime Minister Michel Barnier on 4 December, political instability took over from inflationary fears, despite the appointment of François Bayrou. It has increased, fuelling the budgetary uncertainty it generates. The public deficit also rose again, reaching 6.1% of GDP in 2024. In addition to maintaining the widening of the sovereign yield spread with Germany by nearly 80 basis points (bps), compared to only 50 bps before the dissolution of the National Assembly, this shock would have already cost 0.1 point of GDP in lost growth in 2024 according to the Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques (OFCE), which was mainly due to lower private investment.

Once again, 2025 has begun amidst a period of radical geopolitical, political and economic uncertainty, particularly in France, where the political situation remains very uncertain, despite the constitution of a government before the Christmas holidays by the new Prime Minister François Bayrou. Internationally, the impact of the election of the new US President remains to be seen, whether it is the rapid implementation of customs measures that could slow global trade - by leading to tensions. widespread commercialisation and strong potential for retaliation from China - the risk of losses in economic efficiency and price increases (and therefore of persistently higher interest rates) or the favourable magnitude of the planned fiscal expansion. Added to this is the reaction of monetary policy to the potential resurgence of inflationary seeds and the desire to drive down the dollar.

We can also see a deepening of the economic decline in Europe, Germany and France, due to a loss of competitiveness - also linked to higher energy costs than on the other side of the Atlantic - and to the attractiveness of the Eurozone, in view of the race for industrial hegemony between the two main competitors, China and the United States. The race between the American champion and the Chinese outsider involves a budgetary headlong rush which is set to continue through 2025 and into 2026. Measures to support the US industry, such as the Chips Act and the IRA, have greatly increased the attractiveness of investing in the United States. The profitability gap in their favour could result in Europe losing out to the United States on key localisation projects. As for the Chinese offensive, it is based on price competitiveness, coupled with a rise in technological range. Europe, which has suffered a largely specific energy crisis with the economic sanctions against Russia, has seen the price of its exports rise by more than 30% since the end of 2019, against a maximum of 5% for Chinese exports. In addition, the need to restore a certain fiscal discipline in the Member States of the Eurozone, after the overrun in public finances which was justified by the pandemic, could lead certain countries, such as Italy and France, to present debt and public deficit reduction plans. This would then gradually involve a restriction on public spending, likely to cause a drop in demand.

Across the Atlantic, the Trump programme is based on four main areas, namely deregulation, protectionism, reduction in taxation and public spending, and finally the control of migration flows. It would be moderately inflationary in the short term in 2025 but favourable to growth, while widening public and commercial deficits (to more than 6% of GDP?) . If the increase in tariffs is only 10%, it can probably be offset by the appreciation of the dollar and by the margins of exporters and distributors. Moreover, following the example of the first presidential term, it is not impossible that the anxiety-provoking statements of protectionism are more of a negotiating tactic aimed at forcing Europe to take responsibility for financing its own defence and for China to strengthen its internal demand. The most significant protectionist measure, which would only take effect in 2026, concerns the 60% increase in customs duties vis-à-vis the Middle Kingdom, whose economy is tending to change (significant decline in the weight of real estate in favour of cutting-edge industries and technological services). In retaliation, while avoiding a war on increased customs duties, China may then make it more difficult to export certain strategic inputs such as Gallium, Germanium and Antimony.

In addition, the economic development of Europe’s main trading partners, in particular China, could also present risks. Chinese public and private over-indebtedness is slowing down the country’s ability to keep pace with growth. Ten years after the announcement of the China 2025 plan, which aimed for industrial pre-eminence in 10 key sectors, China’s leadership is still only asserted at the cost of increased trade tensions with its American, Asian and European partners and the instability of the Chinese financial system.

In addition, other perennial sources of instability, such as the continuation of the war in Ukraine, the situation in the Middle East or the Red Sea, could cause tensions on oil and gas prices and shipping costs, resulting in upwards risk on inflation and downwards risk on activity. A scenario in which Ukraine is abandoned in its struggle against Russia could also create the conditions for a climate of concern for Europe. Without going as far as an invasion of Taiwan by China, a major escalation of tensions between these two countries is likely to lead to the implementation of severe sanctions against China, such as the freezing of all Chinese assets and the disconnection of China from all SWIFT platforms, similar to what happened in Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. This poses a major risk for the global economy, particularly for trade flows through the Taiwan Strait. It is used by almost half of the world’s container ships, connecting the electronic equipment factories (leading semiconductors) in East Asia to the rest of the world. This corridor is also used to supply the continent with natural gas and oil. All this could still cause a deep recession, especially in Europe.

In France, in addition to a significant risk of an additional increase in the interest rate risk premium vis-à-vis Germany and a continued drift in public spending, a wait-and-see attitude may turn into mistrust, due to political instability. It may lead to rather cautious spending behaviour by households and businesses, despite the a priori favourable effect of less budgetary consolidation. In particular, savings incentives may remain strong, slowing the expected decline in the household savings rate, due to a need for precaution, with rising unemployment and individual customers’ concern about budgetary imbalances. Regarding companies, the proportion of business leaders who have said that they are postponing their planned investments and hires has increased significantly, according to the BPI France and Rexecode survey on SMEs and medium-sized companies in November 2024. Moreover, despite the relative maintenance of margin levels for all non-financial companies, the increase in financing costs is weighing on corporate profits. The latter fell to a historically low level in 2024. This could even result in an accentuation of the decline in productive investment, despite the improvement in monetary and financial conditions and the trend towards investment in digital and energy transitions. Furthermore, the rather modest improvement in household spending, the main driver of activity, would then be insufficient to counteract the increased prudence of companies in terms of employment, management of inventories and investment, due to the environment of still high interest rates, the deterioration of the cash position of VSEs/SMEs and the rise in insolvencies. In particular, nearly 66,500 companies have failed, reaching the highest level since at least 2009, according to a 2024 report prepared by BPCE L’Observatoire. In the fourth quarter of 2024 alone, 17,966 insolvencies were recorded, according to this source. This record number of insolvencies, which could have dangerous consequences, particularly in terms of jobs, constitutes a warning for economic and political players as we enter 2025, which already promises to be difficult on an economic level and uncertain on a political and budgetary level: 68,000 insolvencies are expected and 240,000 jobs are at risk.

However, the identical renewal of the services voted in the last Finance Act, in addition to the capacity of the State to raise taxes and take on debt to finance itself as well as the Social Security must a priori lead to an ex-ante reduction in the budget deficit, hence a reduction in the budget impulse. The Finance Act for 2025 was adopted on 5 February 2025, and provides for an exceptional contribution on the profits of large companies that will only apply to the financial year ended 31 December 2025 (an exceptional contribution of 41.20%, increasing the effective tax rate to 36.2%). The corporate income tax rate remained at 25.83% for the financial year ended 31 December 2024.

The consensus forecasts presented for 2025, particularly for France, therefore reproduce the economic trends already at work, without necessarily integrating specific measures likely to be taken by the new government, nor the effects of an even more prolonged wait-and-see period, in the event of a misunderstood direction of economic policy.

Lastly, the physical risks related to extreme climate events (heat waves, fires, droughts, floods, etc.) or environmental degradation as well as the risks associated with the transition to an economy with a lower environmental impact are likely to have a material impact on people, companies and public players and have a negative impact on the French economy.

For more detailed information, see sections 5.2 “Economic and financial environment” and 5.8 “2025 economic outlook” in BPCE’s 2024 Universal Registration Document.

The risk of a pandemic (such as the coronavirus – Covid-19) and its economic consequences may adversely impact the Group’s activities, results and financial position.

The emergence of Covid-19 at the end of 2019 and the rapid spread of the pandemic to the whole planet led to a deterioration in the economic situation of many sectors of activity, a financial deterioration of economic agents, and a strong disruption of financial markets, as the affected countries were required to take health measures to respond to it (border closures, lockdown measures, restrictions on the exercise of certain economic activities, etc.). Government (guaranteed loans, tax and social assistance, etc.) and banking (moratoria) schemes have been put in place. Some counterparties may emerge from this unprecedented period weakened.

Massive fiscal and monetary policy measures to support activity were put in place between 2020 and 2022, in particular by the French government (system of state-guaranteed loans for companies and professionals, partial unemployment measures for individuals, as well as numerous other fiscal, social and bill payment measures) and by the European Central Bank (more abundant and less costly access to very significant refinancing allocations). Groupe BPCE has actively participated in the French state-guaranteed loan program in the interest of financially supporting its customers and helping them overcome the effects of this crisis on their activities and income (e.g. automatic six-month deferral on loans to certain professional customers and micro-enterprises/SMEs). There is no way to guarantee, however, that such measures will be enough to offset the negative impacts of the pandemic on the economy or to fully stabilise the financial markets over the long term. In particular, the repayment of state-guaranteed loans may lead to defaults by borrowers and financial losses for Groupe BPCE up to the amount of the portion not guaranteed by the state.

Groupe BPCE may not achieve the objectives of its VISION 2030 strategic plan.

On 26 June 2024, Groupe BPCE presented its strategic plan “Vision 2030” based on three pillars: (i) forging our growth for the long term, (ii) giving our customers trust in their future, and (iii) expressing our cooperative values in all regions. The first pillar aims to make Groupe BPCE a leading banking group promoting diversified growth, open to partnerships, and capable of achieving high levels of performance. The second pillar aims to make the Group a facilitator of access to housing for all, and for all types of needs, to be the go-to player for territorial competitiveness, to protect customers at every moment and stage in their lives, and to simplify relationship models (from 100% physical to 100% digital), notably with the help of AI. The third pillar aims to give full expression to the cooperative values promoted by the Group, which draws its strength from its multifaceted activities and the range of its expertise, from its positive global impact, and from its cooperative shareholders and employees, proud and committed in their day-to-day lives. The new growth model is being implemented in three major geographical circles – France, Europe and the rest of the World – and is based on organic growth, acquisitions, and partnerships.

This strategic vision is accompanied by a trajectory for 2026 based on a macroeconomic scenario that assumes, from 2025 onwards, a rebound in economic growth at rates that may vary from one geographical region to the next, a moderate fall in inflation in 2025 and 2026, a fall in the three-month Euribor and relative stability in long-term interest rates (10-year OAT).

The success of the 2026 financial trajectory is grounded in a large number of initiatives to be rolled out within the various business lines of Groupe BPCE. Although most of the goals defined in the strategic plan are expected to be achieved, some may not, owing to changes in the economic environment or possible changes in accounting and/or tax regulations. If Groupe BPCE does not achieve its ambitions, the 2026 financial trajectory could be affected.

The physical and transitional aspect of the climate risks and their consequences on economic players could adversely affect Groupe BPCE’s activities, results and financial position.

The risks associated with climate change are factors that exacerbate existing risks, including credit risk, operational risk and market risk. In particular, BPCE is exposed to physical and transition climate risk. They potentially carry an image and/or reputation risk.

The physical risk results in increased economic costs and financial losses resulting from the severity and increased frequency of extreme weather events related to climate change (such as heat waves, landslides, floods, late frosts, fires and storms) as well as long-term gradual changes in climate (such as changes in precipitation, extreme weather variability, and rising sea levels and average temperatures). It could have an extensive impact in terms of scope and magnitude, that may affect a wide variety of geographical areas and economic sectors relevant to Groupe BPCE. Thus, the Cevennes episodes that affect south-east France every year can cause the flooding of buildings, factories and offices, slowing down or even make the customer's activity impossible. As a result, physical climate risk can spread along the value chain of Groupe BPCE's corporate customers, which could lead to their default and thus generate financial losses for Groupe BPCE. These physical climate risks are likely to increase and could result in significant losses for Groupe BPCE.

The transition risk is related to the process of adjustment to a low-carbon economy. The process of reducing emissions is likely to have a significant impact on all sectors of the economy by affecting the value of financial assets and the profitability of companies. The increase in costs related to this energy transition for economic players, both companies and individuals, could lead to an increase in defaults and thus significantly increase Groupe BPCE's losses. For example, the energy-climate law of 8 November 2019 will limit the sale and rental of properties with the lowest energy performance from 2023 and more completely in 2028. Some of Groupe BPCE’s customers will therefore have to plan renovation work for a possible future sale or lease of such type of properties. The risk lies in the inability of Groupe BPCE's customers to carry out this costly work and therefore not be able to carry out the financial transaction necessary to balance their budget. These customers of Groupe BPCE could therefore become insolvent, which would result in significant financial losses for Groupe BPCE.

Groupe BPCE may encounter difficulties in adapting, implementing and incorporating its policy governing acquisitions or joint ventures.

The Group may consider acquisition or partnership opportunities in the future. Although Groupe BPCE carries out an in-depth analysis of any potential acquisitions or joint ventures, in general it is impossible to carry out an exhaustive appraisal in every respect. As a result, Groupe BPCE may have to manage initially unforeseen liabilities. Similarly, the results of the acquired company or joint venture may prove disappointing and the expected synergies may not be realised in whole or in part, or the transaction may give rise to higher-than-expected costs. Groupe BPCE may also encounter difficulties with the consolidation of new entities. The failure of an announced acquisition or failure to consolidate a new entity or joint venture may place a strain on Groupe BPCE’s profitability. This situation may also lead to the departure of key employees. In the event that Groupe BPCE is obliged to offer financial incentives to its employees in order to retain them, this situation may also lead to an increase in costs and a decline in profitability. In the case of joint ventures, Groupe BPCE is exposed to additional risks and uncertainties, such as depending on systems, controls and individuals that are not be under its control and could, as such, give rise to  liability,  losses or damage to its reputation. In addition, conflicts or disagreements between Groupe BPCE and its partners could have a negative impact on the benefits sought by the joint venture. 

At 31 December 2024, total investments in equity-consolidated companies amounted to €57 billion and goodwill amounted to €4.3 billion. For further information, please refer to notes 12.4.1 “Investments in equity-consolidated companies” and 3.5 “Goodwill” to the consolidated financial statements of Groupe BPCE.

Intense competition in France, Groupe BPCE’s main market, or internationally, may cause its net income and profitability to decline.

Groupe BPCE’s main business lines operate in a very competitive environment both in France and other parts of the world where it does substantial business. This competition is heightened by consolidation, either through mergers and acquisitions or cooperation and arrangements. Consolidation has created a certain number of companies which, like Groupe BPCE, can offer a wide range of products and services ranging from insurance, loans and deposits to brokerage, investment banking and asset management. Groupe BPCE is in competition with other entities based on a number of factors, including the execution of transactions, products and services offered, innovation, reputation and price. If Groupe BPCE is unable to maintain its competitiveness in France or in its other major markets by offering a range of attractive and profitable products and services, it may lose market share in certain key business lines or incur losses in some or all of its activities.

For example, at 31 December 2024, in France, Groupe BPCE was the 1st bank for SMEs(1) and the 2nd for individual, professional and self-employed customers(2). The Group had a 26.3%(3) market share in home loans(4). For Retail Banking and Insurance, outstanding loans amounted to €724 billion at 31 December 2024, compared to €719 billion at 31 December 2023, with savings deposits of €937 billion at 31 December 2024, compared to €918 billion at 31 December 2023 (for more information on the contribution of each business line, and each network, see section 5.4.2. “The Group’s business lines” of the 2024 Universal Registration Document).

In addition, any slowdown in the global economy or in the economies in which Groupe BPCE’s main markets are located is likely to increase competitive pressure, in particular through increased pressure on prices and a contraction in the volume of activity of Groupe BPCE and its competitors. New, more competitive rivals subject to separate or more flexible regulation or other prudential ratio requirements could also enter the market. These new market participants would thus be able to offer more competitive products and services. Advances in technology and the growth of e-commerce have made it possible for institutions other than custodians to offer products and services that were traditionally considered as banking products, and for financial institutions and other companies to provide electronic and internet-based financial solutions, including electronic securities trading. These new entrants may put downward pressure on the price of Groupe BPCE’s products and services or affect Groupe BPCE’s market share. Advances in technology could lead to rapid and unexpected changes on Groupe BPCE’s markets of operation. Groupe BPCE's competitive position, net income and profitability could be adversely affected if it fails to adapt its activities or strategy adequately to respond to these changes.

Groupe BPCE’s ability to attract and retain skilled employees is paramount to the success of its business and failing to do so may affect its performance.

The employees of Groupe BPCE entities are the Group’s most valuable resource. Competition to attract qualified employees is fierce in many areas of the financial services sector. Groupe BPCE’s earnings and performance depend on its ability to attract new employees and retain existing employees. The current upheavals (technological, economic and customer requirements), particularly in the banking sector, demand major efforts to support and train employees. In the absence of sufficient support, this could prevent Groupe BPCE from taking advantage of potential commercial opportunities, which could consequently affect its performance.

At 31 December 2024, Groupe BPCE had 103,418 registered employees.

Groupe BPCE could be exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks that may have a negative impact on its results and financial position if its model-based risk measurement system should fail.

Groupe BPCE’s risk measurement system is based specifically on the use of models. Groupe BPCE’s portfolio of models mainly includes the Corporate & Investment Banking market models and the credit models of Groupe BPCE and its entities. The models used for strategic decision-making and risk management monitoring (credit, financial (ALM and market), operational including compliance and climatic) could fail, exposing Groupe BPCE to unidentified or unanticipated risks that could result in significant losses.

2Governance and risk management system

2.1 Groupe BPCE system

The risk management function and the compliance certification function ensure, among other tasks, the permanent control of risks and compliance.

The Risk Management and/or Compliance Departments ensure the effectiveness of the risk management system. They ensure the assessment and prevention of risks, the development of the risk policy integrated into the management policies of operational activities and the permanent monitoring of risks.

Within BPCE’s central body, the Risk Management Department and the General Secretariat in charge of compliance, security and permanent controls ensure the consistency, uniformity, effectiveness and completeness of the measurement, monitoring and management of risks. These departments are responsible for the Group’s consolidated risk management.

The missions of the latter are carried out independently of the operational departments. Its operating procedures, particularly in terms of business lines, are set out in the Group’s Risks, Compliance and Permanent Control Charter, approved by the Management Board of BPCE on 7 December 2009 and last updated in December 2021, in line with the order of 3 November 2014, as amended on 25 February 2021, dedicated to internal control. The Risk Management and Compliance Department of our institution is attached to it by a strong functional link.

 

3Capital management and equity adequacy

3.1Regulatory framework

The Basel III agreement, transposed into European Union legislation through the capital requirements regulation (CRR) and the capital requirements directive (CRD), which were passed by the European Parliament on 16 April 2013 and published in the official journal of the European Union on 26 June 2013, defined the prudential supervision rules applicable to credit institutions and investment companies. Institutions concerned are required to maintain an overall capital adequacy ratio of at least 8% at all times.

The CRR and CRD IV texts were reviewed on 7 June 2019. The CRR 2 and CRD V texts were published in the official journal of the European Union for implementation in June 2021.

This capital adequacy ratio is equal to the ratio between total equity and the sum of:

  • assets weighted by credit, counterparty and dilution risk;
  • equity requirements with respect to the prudential supervision of market, operational and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk multiplied by 12.5.

Article 92 (1) of the CRR sets a minimal common equity tier 1 ratio of 4.5% and a minimal equity tier 1 ratio of 6%.

Regulatory equity and Basel III capital adequacy ratios

in millions of euros

31/12/2024

31/12/2023

Consolidated equity

1,180.78

1,157.85

Perpetual deeply subordinated notes classified as other comprehensive income

(100.00)

(100.00)

Consolidated equity excluding perpetual deeply subordinated notes classified as equity

1,080.78

1,057.85

Non-controlling interests

 

 

Common equity tier 1 (CET1) before deductions

1,049.46

1,034.36

Deductions from common equity

 

 

  • Goodwill

 

 

  • Other intangible fixed assets

(4.08)

(4.08)

Other prudential adjustments

(62.81)

(53.28)

Common equity tier 1 (CET1)

982.57

977.00

Deeply subordinated notes

 

 

Other additional equity tier 1 (AT1)

100.00

100.00

Equity tier 1 (A)

1,082.57

1,077.00

Equity tier 2

257.83

237.92

Equity tier 2 (B)

257.83

237.92

Total regulatory equity (A + B)

1,340.40

1,314.92

Credit risk-weighted assets

9,903.00

10,000.14

Market risk-weighted assets

17.55

53.81

Operational risk-weighted assets

677.79

650.39

CVA risk-weighted assets

20.68

13.72

Total Basel III risk-weighted assets

10,619.01

10,718.05

Capital adequacy ratios

 

 

Core tier 1 ratio

9.25%

9.12%

Tier 1 ratio

10.19%

10.05%

Total capital adequacy ratio

12.62%

12.27%

4Credit and counterparty risks

4.1 Definitions

Credit risk is the risk incurred in the event of default by a debtor or counterparty, or debtors or counterparties considered to be the same group of related customers in accordance with regulations; this risk may also result in the loss of value of securities issued by the defaulting counterparty.

Counterparty risk is defined as the risk that the counterparty of a transaction will default before final settlement of all cash flows related to the transaction.

 

5Market risks

5.1 Definition

Market risks are defined as the risk of losses related to changes in market parameters.

Market risks have three main components:

  • interest rate risk: risk that a change in interest rates poses to the holder of a receivable or debt security; this risk may be specific to a particular issuer or to a particular category of issuers whose creditworthiness has been downgraded (credit spread risk);
  • foreign exchange risk: risk that affects receivables and securities denominated in foreign currencies held in the context of capital market activities, due to changes in the price of these currencies expressed in national currency;
  • price change risk: price risk on the position held on a given financial asset, in particular a share.

 

6Structural balance sheet risks

6.1 Definition

Structural balance sheet risks result in a risk of loss, immediate or future, related to changes in commercial or financial parameters and the structure of the balance sheet on banking book activities, excluding proprietary transactions.

Structural balance sheet risks have three main components:

  • liquidity risk is the risk that the institution will not be able to meet its commitments or not be able to settle or offset a position due to market conditions or idiosyncratic factors, within a specified period and at a reasonable cost (order of 3 November 2014, as amended on 25 February 2021, relating to internal control).
  • Liquidity risk is also associated with the inability to transform illiquid assets into liquid assets.
  • Banque Palatine's liquidity is managed closely with Groupe BPCE's central body, which is responsible for the centralised management of refinancing;
  • overall interest rate risk is the risk incurred in the event of a change in interest rates as a result of all balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions, with the exception, where applicable, of the transactions subject to market risk (order of 3 November 2014, as amended on 25 February 2021, relating to internal control);
  • foreign exchange risk is the risk that affects receivables and securities denominated in foreign currencies. It is due to changes in the price of these currencies expressed in national currency.

Banque Palatine's exposure to structural foreign exchange risk is monitored by calculating the RWA for foreign exchange risk (on the trading and banking portfolios).

 

7Operational risks

7.1 Definition

The definition of operational risk is, according to the regulations, the risk of losses resulting from an inadequacy or failure of processes, personnel and internal systems or external events, including legal risk. Operational risk includes risks related to events with a low probability of occurrence but a high impact, the risks of internal and external fraud defined by the regulations, and risks related to the model.

 

8Legal risks

The Legal Affairs Department is responsible for preventing and controlling Banque Palatine's legal risks and litigation risks. It also helps to prevent image risks.

 

8.1Organisation of the Legal Affairs Department

The Legal Affairs Department is made up of five members of staff reporting directly to the head of the Legal Department and the head of the Litigation Department. Each employee is able to handle legal consultations and projects, and take charge of claims and complaints against the bank.

 

9Non-compliance risks

9.1Definition

Non-compliance risk is defined in article 10-p of the order of 3 November 2014, as amended on 25 February 2021, as being the risk of legal, administrative or disciplinary sanctions, significant financial loss or harm to reputation, which arises from non-compliance with provisions specific to banking and financial activities, whether legislative or regulatory, national or European directly applicable, or professional and ethical standards, or instructions from the effective managers taken in accordance with the guidelines of the supervisory body.

10Business continuity

The management of business interruption risks is addressed in its cross-functional dimension, with the analysis of the main critical business lines, in particular liquidity, payment services, securities, loans to individuals and companies, as well as the trustee activity.

10.1Organisation and steering of business continuity

Groupe BPCE's emergency business continuity plan (EBCP) is managed by the Group Business Continuity Department within the Group Security Department of the Group General Secretariat.

The Group head of business continuity (GHBC) is responsible for:

  • managing the Group's business continuity and coordinating the Group's business continuity function;
  • coordinating the Group's crisis management;
  • managing the implementation and maintenance in operational condition of the Group's contingency and business continuity plans;
  • ensuring compliance with regulatory provisions governing business continuity;
  • participating in internal and external bodies of the Group.

Improvement projects continued with the common point of streamlining processes and strengthening systems by drawing on the lessons of past systemic crises (Covid), those ongoing (Russia-Ukraine crisis) or the preparation of anticipated crises (energy breakdown) to which business continuity is fully associated.

The HEBCPs of the Group's institutions report functionally to the Group's HBC and the appointments of the HEBCPs are notified to him.

Banque Palatine's reference framework was reviewed in 2023 and approved by the Operational and Security Risk Committee in February 2023.

The Group's business continuity framework defines the governance of the function, ensured by three levels of bodies, mobilised according to the nature of the decisions to be taken or the approvals to be granted:

  • the Group decision-making and steering bodies in which the Group HBC participates to validate the major guidelines and obtain the necessary arbitration;
  • the Business Continuity Function Committee, an operational coordination body;
  • the Group business continuity plenary, a national plenary body to exchange information and collect issues.

Group business continuity defines, implements and changes the Group's business continuity policy as necessary.

11Information systems security

11.1Organisation and steering of the ISS function

Within the risk management system related to information technology, the Group Information Systems Security Department is in charge of information systems security (ISS) and the fight against cybercrime. The Group Information Systems Security Department reports to the Group General Secretariat.

Groupe BPCE's ISS is organised as a function and is managed by the Group Information Systems Security Department. Management defines, implements and develops the Group's ISS policy.

The ISS Department:

  • coordinates the ISS function, bringing together the CISO of the affiliated parent companies, subsidiaries and IT GIES;
  • oversees the level 2 permanent control framework and the consolidated control of the ISS network;
  • initiates and coordinates Group risk reduction projects; and
  • represents the Group when dealing with the competent interbank or public authorities in its field.

Since March 2020, BPCE-IT’s governance, risks and second-level controls activity has been transferred to the Group Information Systems Security Department:

  • the BPCE-IT ISS governance activity is now the responsibility of the Group ISS Department;
  • the risk and security controls activity is carried out within a new entity reporting to the Group Security Department.

Banque Palatine's CISO and more generally the CISO of all affiliates (parent companies, direct subsidiaries and IT EIGS) report functionally to the Group CISO. This functional link means that:

  • any CISO appointment is notified to the Group CISO;
  • Groupe BPCE’s information systems security policy is adopted by the entities and each local ISS policy is submitted for the opinion of the Group CISO prior to its implementation in the institution;
  • reporting in relation to the level of compliance of the entities with Groupe BPCE’s ISS policy, the permanent ISS control, the level of ISS risks, the main ISS incidents and the actions undertaken are communicated to the Group CISO.

Banque Palatine's CISO shares half of its activity with the coordination of external fraud. He reports to the Operational Risk Department and is supported by a part-time assistant (50%).

 

12Climate risks

As part of the publication of BPCE's first TCFD report in October 2021, the Group Risk Management Department has defined a materiality matrix for climate risks.

The materiality of the risks associated with climate change is assessed by reference to the main risk classes of Basel III pillar 1, namely credit risk, market risk and operational risk, including non-compliance and reputation risk. Groupe BPCE has therefore set up a system to identify climate risk factors that could impact the Group's traditional risks, accompanied by precise management. The climate risk materiality matrix can be applied to all Group entities.

“Acute physical risks” are defined as direct losses triggered by extreme weather events, the resulting damage of which may lead to the destruction of physical assets (real estate and/or production) and cause a drop in local economic activity and possibly a disruption of value chains. “Chronic physical risks” are the direct losses triggered by longer-term climate changes (sea level rise, chronic heat waves, modification of rainfall patterns and increase in their variability, disappearance of certain resources) that may deteriorate the productivity of a given sector.

“Transition risk” results from the economic and financial consequences related to the effects of the implementation of a low-carbon economic model, whether through changes in regulations, technological progress, or changes in consumer expectations and reputational repercussions.

Climate risk management programme

The Climate Risk Department coordinates the implementation of the climate risk management framework through a dedicated programme. This programme, in line with the Group's climate and environmental commitments, addresses specific objectives for all business lines and all functions. The proposed system aims to ensure the most comprehensive coverage of the 13 pillars proposed by the ECB in its guide on climate and environmental risks of November 2020. It also aims to integrate the national or international regulatory perspectives that are currently the reference.

This programme is regularly updated with the points of attention specified by the ECB, initially in its return to the subject of the self-assessment questionnaire, formalised through discussions at the end of 2021, then through the thematic review carried out in early 2022.

Concretely, this system is organised around nine major areas (governance, risk appetite framework, stress test, financial and market risks, operational risk, credit risks, risk control framework, the dashboard and data).

The work and expectations are thus precisely qualified, by theme, making it possible to know and monitor the status, the implementation schedule, the people in charge in the Climate Risk Department and other departments such as those involved in its implementation or the expected deliverables.

Representatives of Banques Populaires, Caisses d’Epargne and Global Financial Services were also involved in the programme to ensure the operationality of the actions planned in each Group entity.

In order to support its own transformation and the transition pathways of all its customers according to the highest standards and with in-depth expertise, the Palatine Group is part of the "Impact Inside" internal transformation plan launched by Groupe BPCE. Internal transformation of all Group companies at all levels

The Impact Inside programme, which involves climate risk management, is being rolled out across the risk functions by strengthening the ESG risk management system. This strengthening is carried out as part of a multi-year action plan incorporating a continuous improvement approach to its climate risk management system with, by the end of 2026, the following objectives:

  • definition and management of the climate risk appetite;
  • deepening the dialogue with customers and extending the analysis of non-financial issues to all credit processes;
  • deployment of advanced risk analysis methods to support decision-making and financial planning processes;
  • support for all sales and risk teams in understanding climate and environmental issues, depending on the sector and region;
  • strengthening of the portfolio risk monitoring system and the dissemination of management indicators;
  • compliance with the climate trajectories to reduce the exposure to risks.

Climate change is a major issue for Banque Palatine. It must be integrated into both its banking activities and its own operations. Banque Palatine's impact on climate change has been identified both in its own operations (own footprint) and via the value chain, through its financing and investment operations. This is the first step in analysing the impacts, risks and opportunities associated with Banque Palatine's identity and business models. The inclusion of these analyses in our models is gradual and depends on the robustness and referencing of the methodology used.

The rating of climate impacts, in connection with financing and investment activities, was carried out by experts based in particular on a sectoral analysis of Groupe BPCE’s exposures carried out by the Group ESG Risk Management Department as part of the magnitude assessment. This rating was reinforced by the views of our stakeholders.

Banque Palatine's stakeholder consultation process is based on the use of various existing mechanisms, supplemented by dedicated mechanisms designed to:

  • contribute to the communication and dissemination of our Impact approach, beyond the double materiality exercise,
  • co-construct and involve our stakeholders in our ESG strategy and in our work to identify and assess impacts, risks and opportunities.

With regard to existing mechanisms:

  • expectations are highlighted during presentations by experts on ESG issues at conferences and other internal communication formats accessible to all employees.

Discussions with regulators and image or forecast surveys are all ways of identifying changes in stakeholder expectations.

Faced with the challenges of transition in general and the environmental emergency in particular, Banque Palatine has made climate change one of the priorities of its 2024 strategic plan, adopting a position of transition as a company and as a player in the financing of the economy.

In terms of opportunities, Banque Palatine has business line teams whose mission is to study market opportunities, draw up business plans and launch useful offers to support its customers' environmental transition.

Taking account of the climate transition is clearly mentioned in the Vision 2030 strategic project as one of the four major areas of development that the Group supports. In this respect, all of Groupe BPCE's business lines and companies, including Banque Palatine, have made climate change a strategic priority.

Our overall positive impact is based on the strength of local solutions that are accessible to all. Banque Palatine offers a global approach that takes account of planetary boundaries and society's needs, providing practical solutions for everyone to help make the transition to a more sustainable and inclusive world. Combating climate change and creating a low-carbon society are major challenges to which the bank has long been committed, with the aim of limiting the climate impact of its financing and investment activities.

Banque Palatine has placed the climate at the heart of its strategy with clear commitments:

  • aligning its portfolios on a Net Zero trajectory;
  • support for all customers in their environmental transition;
  • extending the sustainable refinancing strategy;
  • accelerated reduction of its own environmental footprint.

The ultimate goal is to help build a net zero economy by taking action today. The Group is already taking advantage of this opportunity, with the strong ambition of stepping up its efforts to tackle the major challenge of decarbonising the economy.

 

13Emerging risks

Groupe BPCE places great importance on anticipating and managing emerging risks in today’s constantly changing environment. As such, a forward-looking analysis identifying the risks that could impact the Group is carried out every six months and presented to the Risk and Compliance Committee, then to the board’s Risk Committee.

The macroeconomic context has deteriorated sharply since the beginning of 2022 and has led to a more pessimistic view than the one projected in terms of the result generated by the Group’s activities and the level of risk. In addition, the Covid crisis and the consequences of the crisis in Ukraine have profoundly changed the environment in which the Group’s activities are carried out. They have greatly increased the intensity of the shocks caused by the various types of risks affecting our businesses.

The forthcoming slowdown in economic growth, combined with high and potentially long-term inflation, poses an increased risk of a deterioration in credit portfolios, in particular for certain customer segments with vulnerabilities (business sectors sensitive to the effects of a secondary war in Ukraine and/or inflation, customers with an already high level of debt, etc.).

Vigilance on interest rate and investment risks is also heightened given the highly unfavourable impact that the rise in interest rates and inflation could have on the Group’s profitability in the short and medium term.

The international geopolitical environment remains an area for attention under vigilance, with various geopolitical tensions continuing to weigh on the global economic context and feeding uncertainty.

As the economy and financial services have grown increasingly digitised, banks have had to remain constantly vigilant against cyber-threats. The sophistication of cyber-attacks and potential vulnerability of their IT systems are both major risks for Groupe BPCE, in conjunction with the expectations of the regulatory authority.

The Group is very attentive to changes in the regulatory environment and to the supervisor’s requests, in particular on new provisioning standards, the management and monitoring of leveraged loans, guidelines on non-performing loans, etc.

Climate change is an integral part of the risk management policy, with operational variations being rolled out.

Lastly, the operational risks are the subject of close attention, in particular with the application of crisis management systems when necessary.

1)
2023 Kantar SME-SMI survey.
2)
Market share: 21.9% in household deposits/savings and 26.3% in home loans (Banque de France Q3-2024).
3)
38.4% (rank 2) penetration rate among professional customers and self-employed customers (Pépites CSA 2021-2022 survey).
4)
Balance sheet and financial savings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Notes to the management report

 

 

 

 

AStatement of results for the five previous years

Article R. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code

in thousands of euros

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Share capital at reporting date

 

 

 

 

 

Share capital

688,803

688,803

688,803

688,803

688,803

Number of shares (1)

34,440

34,440

34,440

34,440

34,440

Operations and income for the financial year

 

 

 

 

 

  • Revenue

435,184

501,213

612,846

1,158,262

1,293,009

Income before tax, employee profit-sharing, depreciation, amortisation and impairment

(10,015)

75,359

84,483

145,481

134,059

Income tax

2,398

(9,068)

(3,226)

48,936

27,491

Income after tax, employee profit-sharing, depreciation, amortisation, impairment and provisions

(28,481)

38,410

(2,740)

124,243

58,399

  • Dividend paid (2)

-

-

-

50,364

56,110

EARNINGS PER SHARE (IN EUROS)

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

12.64

14.55

17.79

33.63

37.54

Income after tax, employee profit-sharing, but before depreciation, amortisation and impairment

(0.31)

1.74

2.61

6.16

5.05

Income tax

0.07

(0.26)

(0.09)

1.42

0.80

Income after tax, employee profit-sharing, depreciation, amortisation, impairment and provisions

(0.83)

1.12

(0.08)

3.61

1.70

Dividend per share (2)

 

 

 

1.46

1.63

Employee data

 

 

 

 

 

Average headcount

1,293

1,182

1,105

1,098

1,095

o/w managerial staff

839

807

777

822

822

o/w non-managerial

454

375

328

276

273

Total wage bill for the year

77,851

79,992

71,594

68,516

70,645

Amount of employee benefits during the period

38,031

36,122

37,193

36,527

37,232

  • (1)Earnings per share are calculated based on the number of shares outstanding at the date of the General Meeting.
  • (2)Subject to approval by the General Meeting.

B Information on supplier and customer payment periods

Invoices received and due 
but not settled at the reporting date

(table provided for in I of article D. 441-6-1)

0 days

(indicative)

1 to
 30 days

31 to
 60 days

61 to
 90 days

91 days and more

Total

(1 day and more)

Number of invoices concerned

10

14

8

5

18

45

Total amount, inclusive of VAT, of the invoices concerned (in euros)

72,891

339,501

52,296

8,267

47,979

448,043

Percentage of the total amount of purchases, inclusive of VAT, for the financial year

0.09%

0.44%

0.07%

0.01%

0.06%

0.57%

 

Invoices received in arrears during the year

(table provided for in II of article D. 441-6-1)

0 days

(indicative)

1 to
 30 days

31 to
 60 days

61 to
 90 days

91 days and more

Total

(1 day and more)

Number of invoices concerned

3,108

1,764

427

213

281

2,685

Total amount, inclusive of VAT, of the invoices concerned (in euros)

37,283,731

29,557,350

3,773,797

4,290,828

2,551,924

40,173,900

Percentage of the total amount of purchases, 
inclusive of VAT, for the financial year

47.81%

37.90%

4.84%

5.50%

3.27%

51.52%

 

This information does not include banking transactions and related operations. For Banque Palatine customer receivables and liabilities, see appendix 4.14 to chapter 2 on the maturity of loans and borrowings, which provides information on their residual maturity.

C Appropriation of earnings for the 2024 financial year

Sources

 

Net profit

€58,398,526.29

Carried forward

€283,777,295.14

TOTAL

€342,175,821.43

 

Appropriation

 

Allocation to the legal reserve

€2,919,926.31

Dividend payments

€56,110,352.03

Carried forward

€283,145,543.08

TOTAL

€342,175,821.43

DInformation on inactive accounts

Articles L. 312-19, L. 312-20, and R. 312-21 of the French Monetary
and Financial Code

From 1 January to 31 December 2024

  • Number of inactive accounts at the bank: 5,961.

Total amount of deposits and assets in these accounts: €29,001,829.84

  • Number of accounts for which deposits and assets are deposited with Caisse des dépôts et consignations (CDC): see table below.
  • Total amount of deposits and assets deposited with Caisse des dépôts et consignations: see table below.

Year 2024

Number of accounts whose assets
 are deposited with CDC

Amount of funds deposited
 with CDC

Quarter 1

39

554,093.03

Quarter 2

56

396,239.99

Quarter 3

48

482,518.45

Quarter 4

25

331,153.30

TOTAL TO BE DECLARED

168

1,764,004.77

EList of business and private banking centres, premium branches and other locations

North-East France: 9 business and private banking centres

 

 

 

 

Paris Matignon

12, avenue Matignon

75008

Paris

Paris Opéra

24 bis, avenue de l'Opéra

75001

Paris

Nogent-Sur-Marne

1, avenue de Lattre de Tassigny

94130

Nogent-Sur-Marne

Saint-Germain-en-Laye

4, rue d'Alsace

78100

St-Germain-en-Laye

Caen - Normandy

12, rue Ferdinand Buisson

14280

Saint-Contest

Lille - Hauts-de-France

56, boulevard de la Liberté

59000

Lille

Dijon - Bourgogne-Franche-Comté

20, boulevard de Brosses

21000

Dijon

Metz - Lorraine Champagne

1, rue des Messageries

57000

Metz

 

Immeuble Zash - Rue Frédéric Passy

51430

Bezannes

Strasbourg - Alsace

1, avenue de la Liberté

67000

Strasbourg

 

6. Draft resolutions submitted to the Ordinary General Meeting on 28 May 2025

 

First resolution

The General Meeting, under the conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings as to quorum and majority, having reviewed the Board of Directors’ management report and corporate governance report, and the Statutory Auditors' report on the annual financial statements of Banque Palatine for the year ended 31 December 2024, approves the annual financial statements showing a profit of €58,398,526.29.

Pursuant to article 223 quater of the French General Tax Code, the General Meeting approves the expenditure and charges covered by paragraph 4 of article 39 of said code, totalling €64,285.44.

Second resolution

The General Meeting, under the conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings as to quorum and majority, and having reviewed the Board of Directors’ management report and corporate governance report, and the Statutory Auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements of Banque Palatine for the year ended 31 December 2024, approves the IFRS consolidated financial statements showing net income Group’s share of €80,698,645.76.

Third resolution

The General Meeting, voting under the quorum and majority conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings, approves the appropriation of earnings for the year ended 31 December 2024, as proposed by the Board of Directors:

 

 

Net profit

€58,398,526.29

Carried forward

€283,777,295.14

TOTAL

€342,175,821.43

 

 

 

Allocation to the legal reserve

€2,919,926.31

Dividend payments

€56,110,352.03

Carried forward

€283,145,543.08

TOTAL

€342,175,821.43

 

Following this allocation, the balance of the legal reserve amounted to €61,978,986.27 and the balance of carried forward to €283,145,543.08.

In application of article 243 bis of the French Tax Code, shareholders are reminded that the dividends paid in respect of the last three financial years were as follows:

Year ended

Par value

Number
 of shares

Dividend/
income
 distributed
 per share

31/12/2021

€20

34,440,134

-

31/12/2022

€20

34,440,134

-

31/12/2023

€20

34,440,134

1.46

 

Fourth resolution

The General Meeting, under the conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings as to quorum and majority, and having been informed of the Statutory Auditors' special report, ratifies, in accordance with articles L. 225-40 of the French Commercial Code, the amendment to Didier Moaté's pension contract, which was authorised by the Board of Directors on 4 April 2024.

Fifth resolution

The General Meeting, voting on the quorum and majority conditions for Ordinary General Meetings, and having reviewed the Statutory Auditors' special report on agreements governed by article L. 225-38 of the French Commercial Code, notes this report and approves said agreements and the terms of said report.

Sixth resolution

The General Meeting, under the conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings as to quorum and majority, and having reviewed the Board of Directors’ corporate governance report, issues a favourable opinion on the overall package for all types of remuneration paid during the year ended 31 December 2024 to all staff members belonging to the regulated population, amounting to €9,520,400.

Seventh resolution

The General Meeting, voting under the quorum and majority conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings, sets the total annual amount of remuneration paid to members of the Board of Directors at €134,500, applicable for the 2025 financial year.

Eighth resolution

The General Meeting, voting under the quorum and majority conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings, resolves to renew the appointment of Deloitte et Associés as Statutory Auditors for a term of six financial years, until the General Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2030.

Ninth resolution

The General Meeting, voting under the quorum and majority conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings, resolves to appoint Forvis Mazars as Statutory Auditor for a term of six financial years, i.e. until the General Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2030.

Tenth resolution

The General Meeting, under the conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings as to quorum and majority, and having considered the report of the Board of Directors, resolves, in accordance with articles L. 821-40 et seq. of the French Commercial Code, to appoint Forvis Mazars as the Statutory Auditor responsible for certifying sustainability information for a term of one financial year, pursuant to article 38 of Ordinance no. 2023-1142 of 6 December 2023, i.e. until the General Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2025.

Eleventh resolution

The General Meeting, voting under the quorum and majority conditions required for Ordinary General Meetings, grants full powers to the bearer of a copy or extract of the minutes of this meeting in order to carry out the publication formalities provided for by law.

 

Logo officiel AMF

This annual financial report is a reproduction in PDF, translated in english, of the official version of the annual financial report in ESEF (European Single Electronic Format) and in french filed with the AMF on 24 April 2025 and available on our website : https://www.palatine.fr/votre-banque/nos-engagements/publications-financieres/